AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Abstracts</strong> sunday morning 163<br />
MURDER BY CELLO: JOHN CAGE MEETS CHARLOTTE MOORMAN<br />
Benjamin Piekut<br />
University of Southampton<br />
The cellist and performance artist Charlotte Moorman (1933–91) was one of the most important<br />
organizing forces of experimental music in New York City, and her catalytic role in<br />
galvanizing the avant-garde in the 1960s and ’70s has never been adequately assessed. Her<br />
signature work was John Cage’s 26' 1.1499'' for a String Player, a challenging score from the<br />
mid-1950s that is representative of the general modernist impulse to disarticulate musical<br />
sound into its component parts (pitch, duration, timbre, and amplitude). Although each of<br />
these properties might imply specific relationships to others in traditional musical composition<br />
(for example, a rise in pitch is often accompanied by a brighter tone and louder volume),<br />
Cage isolates and treats each separately. The result is a complicated graphic notation that significantly<br />
denaturalizes the performer’s relationship with her instrument.<br />
The composer further variegates his sonic texture by notating a layer of (nonspecified)<br />
noises and sound effects to be added by the instrumentalist. This direction allowed Moorman<br />
and her collaborator, Korean-born composer Nam June Paik, to transform 26' 1.1499''<br />
into a sonic and theatrical register of the most important themes of its time: flower power,<br />
the women’s movement, black nationalism, the Vietnam war, consumer culture, the sexual<br />
revolution, rock ’n’ roll, free speech, and Watergate. Moorman expressed these themes in the<br />
form of text recitations, tape and phonograph playback, and a number of theatrical gestures.<br />
Although Cage himself embraced a certain theatricality in his performances of this period, he<br />
was not an admirer of Moorman’s interpretation—in a 1967 letter, he referred to this composition<br />
as “the one Charlotte Moorman has been murdering all along.” What did he find so<br />
“wrong” about this performance? Using Moorman’s heavily annotated copy of the score, her<br />
correspondence, and other non-textual documents from the 1960s and ’70s, this presentation<br />
reconstructs Moorman’s interpretation of 26' 1.1499'' to uncover the basis of her disagreements<br />
with the composer of the work. The conflict seems to have turned on the question of what<br />
is properly included in the category of “everyday life.” Could it include politics? Sexuality?<br />
Bodies of every type?<br />
Furthermore, I use insights from Foucauldian ethics and feminist theory to answer the<br />
common claim that such disruptive performances automatically constitute feminist resistance<br />
or transgression. I argue that Cage’s score is an example of what Foucault termed problematization:<br />
“the motion by which one detaches oneself from [thought], establishes it as an<br />
object, and reflects on it as a problem.” If 26' 1.1499'' was a tool for disassembling the customary<br />
method of playing the cello, framing “proper” technique as an object of reflection, then<br />
Moorman used the score correctly, albeit toward unforeseen ends. The limited vocabulary of<br />
resistance fails to register the ways in which, in the words of anthropologist Saba Mahmood,<br />
“norms are not only consolidated and/or subverted, . . . but performed, inhabited, and experienced<br />
in a variety of ways.”