14.01.2013 Views

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Abstracts</strong> sunday morning 163<br />

MURDER BY CELLO: JOHN CAGE MEETS CHARLOTTE MOORMAN<br />

Benjamin Piekut<br />

University of Southampton<br />

The cellist and performance artist Charlotte Moorman (1933–91) was one of the most important<br />

organizing forces of experimental music in New York City, and her catalytic role in<br />

galvanizing the avant-garde in the 1960s and ’70s has never been adequately assessed. Her<br />

signature work was John Cage’s 26' 1.1499'' for a String Player, a challenging score from the<br />

mid-1950s that is representative of the general modernist impulse to disarticulate musical<br />

sound into its component parts (pitch, duration, timbre, and amplitude). Although each of<br />

these properties might imply specific relationships to others in traditional musical composition<br />

(for example, a rise in pitch is often accompanied by a brighter tone and louder volume),<br />

Cage isolates and treats each separately. The result is a complicated graphic notation that significantly<br />

denaturalizes the performer’s relationship with her instrument.<br />

The composer further variegates his sonic texture by notating a layer of (nonspecified)<br />

noises and sound effects to be added by the instrumentalist. This direction allowed Moorman<br />

and her collaborator, Korean-born composer Nam June Paik, to transform 26' 1.1499''<br />

into a sonic and theatrical register of the most important themes of its time: flower power,<br />

the women’s movement, black nationalism, the Vietnam war, consumer culture, the sexual<br />

revolution, rock ’n’ roll, free speech, and Watergate. Moorman expressed these themes in the<br />

form of text recitations, tape and phonograph playback, and a number of theatrical gestures.<br />

Although Cage himself embraced a certain theatricality in his performances of this period, he<br />

was not an admirer of Moorman’s interpretation—in a 1967 letter, he referred to this composition<br />

as “the one Charlotte Moorman has been murdering all along.” What did he find so<br />

“wrong” about this performance? Using Moorman’s heavily annotated copy of the score, her<br />

correspondence, and other non-textual documents from the 1960s and ’70s, this presentation<br />

reconstructs Moorman’s interpretation of 26' 1.1499'' to uncover the basis of her disagreements<br />

with the composer of the work. The conflict seems to have turned on the question of what<br />

is properly included in the category of “everyday life.” Could it include politics? Sexuality?<br />

Bodies of every type?<br />

Furthermore, I use insights from Foucauldian ethics and feminist theory to answer the<br />

common claim that such disruptive performances automatically constitute feminist resistance<br />

or transgression. I argue that Cage’s score is an example of what Foucault termed problematization:<br />

“the motion by which one detaches oneself from [thought], establishes it as an<br />

object, and reflects on it as a problem.” If 26' 1.1499'' was a tool for disassembling the customary<br />

method of playing the cello, framing “proper” technique as an object of reflection, then<br />

Moorman used the score correctly, albeit toward unforeseen ends. The limited vocabulary of<br />

resistance fails to register the ways in which, in the words of anthropologist Saba Mahmood,<br />

“norms are not only consolidated and/or subverted, . . . but performed, inhabited, and experienced<br />

in a variety of ways.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!