AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
182 sunday morning <strong>AMS</strong> <strong>Philadelphia</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />
this use of spiritual topics was a means by which some African <strong>American</strong> men constructed<br />
for themselves an alternative masculinity, differentiated from the more overt sexualization of<br />
others on the R&B charts.<br />
Ultimately, I find that the use of religious topics in this early doo-wop is a precursor to a<br />
more well-known later fad—the adoption of de-sexualized lyrical subjects and increasingly<br />
younger singers as a means by which to counter public fears of African <strong>American</strong> masculinity.<br />
This topic is important not only in and of itself; it also address one of the major points of inquiry<br />
in post-war African <strong>American</strong> music—the shifting duality of the secular and the sacred.<br />
It also provides insight into the relationship of music and politics in the early Cold War, and<br />
the complex cultural work behind the famous push for desegregation triggered by Brown v<br />
Board of education in 1954.<br />
RECALLING THE VOICE OF JULIUS EASTMAN<br />
Ryan Dohoney<br />
Columbia University<br />
In the past decade the musical practices of the downtown New York City art scene have garnered<br />
increased scholarly attention. From Bernard Gendron to Kyle Gann, music historians<br />
and composer-critics have begun assessing the legacy of Downtown in the period of roughly<br />
1974 to 1987. Downtown is notable for its geographic compactness as well as the sheer diversity<br />
of musical practices that flourished there. New wave rock, post-minimalist classical music,<br />
disco, and loft jazz are just the first names on a long and varied list of styles that flourished<br />
there. Accounting for this heterotopia is no small feat for music historians and requires attention<br />
to the contingencies of the urban landscape and the ease with which numerous musicians<br />
moved from style to style, venue to venue, while often leaving little evidence of their work in<br />
either score or recorded form. However, the proximity of Downtown’s heyday to our present<br />
moment allows for some recuperation of the past through ethnography and the still-living<br />
memory of musicians active in this milieu. Doing the history of downtown is meticulous,<br />
genealogical, and ineluctably social.<br />
This paper presents an account of one path of Downtown’s socio-musical network and<br />
recovers part of the history of a central, yet nearly forgotten figure: the composer-performer<br />
Julius Eastman (1940–1990). Most well known for his recording of eight Songs for a Mad King<br />
by Peter Maxwell Davies, Eastman began his career with the Creative Associates at SUNY<br />
Buffalo as a protege of Lukas Foss. At Buffalo he performed with many of the most important<br />
composers of the late twentieth century including Morton Feldman, Lejaren Hiller, and<br />
Frederic Rzewski. Eastman left the Creative Associates in 1976 and settled in New York’s East<br />
Village in the thick of Downtown’s cultural ferment.<br />
From 1976 until his death in 1990 Julius’ model of musicianship expanded to include<br />
free jazz, improvisation, new wave rock, disco, as well as his own composed music that is<br />
marked by intense repetition and political aggressiveness. An account of this diversity and<br />
the possibilities for a musical identity that it suggests is the focus of the latter portion of my<br />
paper. Working from interviews with Eastman’s friends and collaborators, including Meredith<br />
Monk, Mary Jane Leach, and Peter Kotik, I show the importance of Eastman’s performances,<br />
particularly his vocal performances, to the collaborative music-making of Downtown.<br />
I follow Eastman’s voice to the varied sites of music-making in the geography of Downtown:<br />
experimental music at the Kitchen, improvisation at the Experimental Intermedia