click here to download - UniKL MIMET Official Website
click here to download - UniKL MIMET Official Website
click here to download - UniKL MIMET Official Website
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Background and Problem Statement<br />
The paper (Industries Energy, Utilities & Mining,<br />
2007) has highlighted as the following:<br />
“Many companies are struggling <strong>to</strong> optimize<br />
their LNG portfolio of assets and contracts in<br />
a way that maximizes value. Opportunities<br />
for ‘arbitrage’ profits require ever more<br />
clever valuation and modeling. The companies<br />
that identify, assess and manage the<br />
increasingly complex interdependencies and<br />
uncertainties in the evolving LNG market will<br />
be the ones who take the profits. LNG relies<br />
on two vital ingredients – infrastructure and<br />
gas”<br />
The situation has indirectly rerouted the<br />
existing LNG system in<strong>to</strong> a new market regime<br />
especially on its facilities from onshore <strong>to</strong> the<br />
coastal trend. It has induced the market player<br />
<strong>to</strong> get in<strong>to</strong> this particular regime as it requires<br />
no land requisition. Thus a real ‘new world gas<br />
market’ began <strong>to</strong> emerge. However a ‘world gas<br />
market’ should not be confused with the much<br />
more flexible world oil market (Jensen, 2004).<br />
The Industries Energy, Utilities & Mining (2007)<br />
also highlighted on the regula<strong>to</strong>ry aspects fol‐<br />
lows:<br />
“Taking account of regula<strong>to</strong>ry risk “LNG operations<br />
are spreading <strong>to</strong> many new locations.<br />
The maturity and format of regula<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
frameworks vary considerably. The economic<br />
viability of an LNG chain can be influenced<br />
significantly by national or regional regulation,<br />
particularly on regasification facilities.”<br />
Although several frameworks have<br />
been developed by the LNG players such as Ball<br />
et al, (2006), who proposed a legal framework<br />
for the Taiwanese government it is specifically<br />
for procurement activities in Taiwan. As in Not‐<br />
teboom et al (2004), the only focused area in<br />
Snøhvit project Norway is on LNG port manage‐<br />
ment. T<strong>here</strong> is no formal framework <strong>to</strong> govern<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
the carriage of this particular dangerous goods<br />
carriage. Hence, a special attention on the de‐<br />
velopment of the Legal Framework on the<br />
Coastal Water for LNG transportation and appli‐<br />
cation is required.<br />
The immediate sign of market demand is<br />
the clear indication that LNG transportation will<br />
centre on the downstream activities as compared <strong>to</strong><br />
the upstream. Product distribution which cover the<br />
following aspects:<br />
�Overcoming problems associated with the trans‐<br />
portation of LNG by land.<br />
�Towards cost effective LNG transportation in<br />
downstream market activities.<br />
�Provision of a healthy, safe and secure environ‐<br />
ment of LNG transportation /carriage within<br />
coastal water.<br />
Morimo<strong>to</strong> (2006) estimated the world LNG<br />
consumption exponentially rises from 139 m/<strong>to</strong>ns<br />
<strong>to</strong> 286 m/<strong>to</strong>ns in his JGC Fiscal Interim Result. The<br />
above prediction is supported by Nilsen (2007),<br />
research on LNG Trade Volume, w<strong>here</strong> momen‐<br />
<strong>to</strong>us growth of short‐term trade from 1998 <strong>to</strong><br />
2006 as shown in Figure 2.1. Thus, existing facili‐<br />
ties need <strong>to</strong> be tripled by 2020 by all means and<br />
sizes as in Figure 2.2.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
76