Employers' Handbook on ILO Standards-related Activities
Employers' Handbook on ILO Standards-related Activities
Employers' Handbook on ILO Standards-related Activities
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4<br />
EMPLOYERS’ HANDBOOK ON <strong>ILO</strong> STANDARDS-RELATED ACTIVITIES<br />
The <strong>ILO</strong> was the <strong>on</strong>ly part of the League of Nati<strong>on</strong>s to survive the Sec<strong>on</strong>d World<br />
War and standard-setting work was taken up again in 1946. ILS were adopted <strong>on</strong> issues<br />
such as freedom of associati<strong>on</strong>, equality of opportunity in employment, minimum<br />
wages, labour administrati<strong>on</strong>, industrial relati<strong>on</strong>s, employment policy, working c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
social security, occupati<strong>on</strong>al health, and employment at sea. As time went by,<br />
internati<strong>on</strong>al rules were developed <strong>on</strong> many social and labour issues, and made available<br />
to member States.<br />
During the decades of the “cold war”, <strong>ILO</strong> standard-setting and supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
were repeatedly attacked by communist countries, which regarded these activities as<br />
interference with nati<strong>on</strong>al sovereignty. Because of communist party dominati<strong>on</strong>, true<br />
freedom of associati<strong>on</strong> and tripartism did not exist in most of these countries until<br />
1990.<br />
To date, ILS have exerted a remarkable influence <strong>on</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al labour law and practice<br />
in countries all over the world. Although other means of acti<strong>on</strong>, in particular technical<br />
cooperati<strong>on</strong>, have gained importance over the years, ILS have retained a key role<br />
in this regard and tripartism is still a unique feature in <strong>ILO</strong> standards-<strong>related</strong> activities.<br />
The <strong>ILO</strong> is regarded as the most important internati<strong>on</strong>al organizati<strong>on</strong> setting, promoting<br />
and supervising ILS. Its outstanding normative role in social and labour matters<br />
has been rec<strong>on</strong>firmed and strengthened in recent years by the World Summit for Social<br />
Development, held in Copenhagen in 1995 and by the WTO Ministerial Meeting in<br />
Singapore in 1996.<br />
Appendix 1 lists the official titles of all C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>s and Recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
adopted by the <strong>ILO</strong> in chr<strong>on</strong>ological order. These provide a good historical overview<br />
of <strong>ILO</strong> standard-setting.<br />
For more detail, see:<br />
l Waline, Pierre: Un patr<strong>on</strong> au bureau internati<strong>on</strong>al du travail (Paris, 1976).<br />
l Oechslin, J.-J.: The Internati<strong>on</strong>al Organisati<strong>on</strong> of Employers, Three quarters of a<br />
century at the service of enterprises (1913 – 1998) (Geneva, 2001).<br />
Rati<strong>on</strong>ale for ILS<br />
The basic idea behind ILS is to promote improvements in social and labour c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
at nati<strong>on</strong>al level through regulati<strong>on</strong> at internati<strong>on</strong>al level.<br />
The reas<strong>on</strong>s and motives for ILS are affirmed in more detail in the Preamble to the<br />
<strong>ILO</strong> C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>. They were complemented in 1944 by the Declarati<strong>on</strong> of Philadelphia,<br />
which is appended to the <strong>ILO</strong> C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Despite changes of interpretati<strong>on</strong> and shifts in emphasis over the course of time,<br />
the basic justificati<strong>on</strong> for ILS remains valid to date:<br />
l There is a need to adopt humane c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s of work.<br />
This is the moral or humanitarian motive for setting ILS. The Declarati<strong>on</strong> of Philadelphia<br />
(1944) complemented this motive with the more dynamic c<strong>on</strong>cept that “all<br />
human beings … have the right to pursue both their material well-being and their<br />
spiritual development in c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s of freedom and dignity, of ec<strong>on</strong>omic security