Employers' Handbook on ILO Standards-related Activities
Employers' Handbook on ILO Standards-related Activities
Employers' Handbook on ILO Standards-related Activities
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
24<br />
EMPLOYERS’ HANDBOOK ON <strong>ILO</strong> STANDARDS-RELATED ACTIVITIES<br />
This provisi<strong>on</strong> implies the following opti<strong>on</strong>s/scenarios:<br />
l A member State intends to ratify a C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> after it has brought nati<strong>on</strong>al law<br />
and practice into line with the provisi<strong>on</strong>s of the C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>. This is often a gradual<br />
process leading to ratificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly after a (l<strong>on</strong>ger) period of time, particularly<br />
when the adaptati<strong>on</strong>s to be made involve a rise of labour standards which depend<br />
<strong>on</strong> higher productivity levels.<br />
l A member State sees ratificati<strong>on</strong> of a C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> as generally inappropriate. This<br />
does not necessarily mean that the Member disagrees with the main objectives of<br />
the C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>. Minor disparities or peculiarities in domestic law and practice,<br />
such as the distributi<strong>on</strong> of legislative competence in Federal States, often lead to a<br />
government’s decisi<strong>on</strong> not to ratify. Law and practice may nevertheless be broadly<br />
in compliance with the substantial principles of a C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
If the competent authorities do not c<strong>on</strong>sent to ratify a new C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>, employers’<br />
and workers’ organizati<strong>on</strong>s must be informed of this decisi<strong>on</strong> (art. 23, para. 2, <strong>ILO</strong><br />
C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>, see Chapter V). In additi<strong>on</strong>, governments should c<strong>on</strong>sult employers’ and<br />
workers’ organizati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> “the re-examinati<strong>on</strong> at appropriate intervals of unratified<br />
C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>s and of Recommendati<strong>on</strong>s to which effect has not yet been given, to c<strong>on</strong>sider<br />
what measures might be taken to promote their implementati<strong>on</strong> and ratificati<strong>on</strong><br />
as appropriate” (Art. 5, para. 1 (c) of C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> No. 144; para. 5 (d) of Recommendati<strong>on</strong><br />
No. 152). These c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong>s are obligatory for governments of countries having<br />
ratified C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> No. 144.<br />
See also:<br />
l <strong>ILO</strong>: List of ratificati<strong>on</strong>s by C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> and by country (as at 31 December),<br />
Report III (Part 2), Internati<strong>on</strong>al Labour C<strong>on</strong>ference (Geneva, issued yearly).<br />
IOE: Analysis of Ratificati<strong>on</strong>s of <strong>ILO</strong> C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>s (1970-1996) (November 2000).<br />
l