25.01.2013 Views

AnnuAl REPORT 2011-2012 - Sbs

AnnuAl REPORT 2011-2012 - Sbs

AnnuAl REPORT 2011-2012 - Sbs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

oRGaNISaTIoN<br />

Findings<br />

During <strong>2011</strong>–12 investigations into 219 formal<br />

complaints were completed. the SbS Ombudsman<br />

upheld 27 complaints and dismissed 127 complaints.<br />

eighteen of these upholds related to complaints about<br />

closed captioning. One complaint investigation was<br />

suspended at the request of the complainant.<br />

Sixty-four complaints were referred to the complaints<br />

committee which is chaired by the Managing Director,<br />

Michael ebeid, and comprises the Director of television<br />

and Online content, the Director of Audio and Language<br />

Services, the Director of News and current Affairs, the<br />

Director of Strategy and communication and the SbS<br />

Ombudsman.<br />

the 63 complaints about the Promise were of a<br />

similar nature and principally alleged a breach of SbS’s<br />

prejudice, racism and discrimination code. the matter<br />

was referred to the SbS complaints committee which did<br />

not uphold the complaints. the complaints committee<br />

found that the characterisations in the Promise did not<br />

cross the threshold into racism, and in particular did not<br />

promote, endorse, or reinforce inaccurate, demeaning or<br />

discriminatory stereotypes. the committee was satisfied<br />

that the ordinary reasonable viewer would appreciate that<br />

the Promise was a fictional drama.<br />

the complaints committee also met to consider the<br />

classification of the film chiko. the film is a drama<br />

about the drug underworld set in Hamburg and was<br />

broadcast as an MAv classified film. MAv is the highest<br />

classification level on free-to-air television. SbS had<br />

also provided additional consumer advice of ‘strong<br />

violence, drug use, very coarse language and a sex<br />

scene’. the complaints committee dismissed a<br />

complaint that the film was incorrectly classified. the<br />

complainant subsequently appealed the decision to<br />

the AcMA who also found there was no breach of the<br />

SbS codes of Practice.<br />

Overall the SbS Ombudsman upheld approximately<br />

17 per cent of formal complaints which was consistent<br />

with the previous year. the majority of these upheld<br />

complaints related to a range of technical issues with<br />

closed captioning which occurred during the transition<br />

phase to a digital service.<br />

60 SBS<br />

Australian Communications and Media Authority<br />

in <strong>2011</strong>–12 the AcMA completed two investigations<br />

which had continued from the previous two financial<br />

years. in july <strong>2011</strong> the AcMA found that SbS had not<br />

breached its complaints handling code by not exercising<br />

its discretion to investigate a complaint which was<br />

lodged out of time. in September <strong>2011</strong>, the AcMA<br />

found that SbS had breached code 4.5 (classification<br />

categories) by placing an M level promotion in a PG<br />

program that was broadcast in an M timeslot. the<br />

AcMA found that SbS had breached the code because<br />

effectively the PG program contained material that was<br />

greater than mild in impact.<br />

During <strong>2011</strong>–12 the AcMA commenced seven new<br />

investigations of SbS content. Six of these investigations<br />

were completed during <strong>2011</strong>–12 and five of the<br />

complaints were dismissed. One complaint relating to the<br />

classification of the film 13 tzameti was upheld by the<br />

AcMA. this complaint had previously also been upheld<br />

by the SbS Ombudsman. One AcMA investigation about<br />

closed captioning of SbS programs is still in progress.<br />

Matters required to be reported under<br />

other legislation<br />

Work Health and Safety Act <strong>2011</strong> (WHS Act)<br />

Transition from the Occupational Health and Safety Act<br />

1991 to WHS Act<br />

SbS has transitioned from the Occupational Health and<br />

Safety Act 1991 (OH&S Act) to the Work Health and<br />

Safety Act <strong>2011</strong> (WHS Act) which came into effect on<br />

1 january <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

SbS is committed to fostering a positive safety and<br />

wellbeing culture, and to ensuring the health and safety<br />

of all employees, freelancers, contractors at work, and<br />

members of the public who may be affected by our work.<br />

SbS engaged ernst & Young to conduct a WHS internal<br />

audit. the audit concluded that SbS is in a strong<br />

position in respect of its adherence to the WHS Act.<br />

the audit noted that SbS had prepared for the changes<br />

to the legislation by updating its WHS documentation<br />

and providing training on the WHS Act to Health and<br />

Safety committee Members, senior managers and the<br />

executive committee.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!