08.02.2013 Views

Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures vol. 5 (2010 ... - MSP

Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures vol. 5 (2010 ... - MSP

Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures vol. 5 (2010 ... - MSP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

764 XIAO-TING HE, QIANG CHEN, JUN-YI SUN, ZHOU-LIAN ZHENG AND SHAN-LIN CHEN<br />

From (30), we may have<br />

∂2w ∂x 2 = 4C1(3x 2 − a 2 �� �<br />

y 2 �<br />

) + 1 ,<br />

4b<br />

∂2w C1<br />

=<br />

∂y 2 8b2 (x2 − a 2 ) 2 ,<br />

∂2w C1<br />

=<br />

∂x∂y 2b2 (x3 − a 2 x)y. (35)<br />

Substituting (35) into (34), after integrating we obtain<br />

�<br />

E<br />

U =<br />

+ t3 1<br />

6[1 − (µ + ) 2 ] F+ E<br />

+<br />

−t 3 2<br />

6[1 − (µ − ) 2 ] F−<br />

�<br />

C 2 1 , (36)<br />

where<br />

F + = 8 a<br />

315<br />

9 �<br />

16<br />

+<br />

b3 315 −µ+ 136<br />

105<br />

� a 7<br />

The right end <strong>of</strong> (31) may be computed as<br />

� a � b<br />

−a<br />

b<br />

qwm dx dy =<br />

−b<br />

4003<br />

+<br />

75 a5b, F − = 8 a<br />

315<br />

9 �<br />

16<br />

+<br />

b3 315 −µ− 136<br />

105<br />

� a � b<br />

−a<br />

−b<br />

� a 7<br />

b<br />

+ 4003<br />

75 a5 b. (37)<br />

q(x 2 − a 2 ) 2�� �<br />

y 2 �<br />

+ 1 dx dy =<br />

4b<br />

98<br />

45 qa5b. (38)<br />

Substituting (36) <strong>and</strong> (38) into (31), we may obtain the formula for C1. After substituting it into (30),<br />

we finally obtain the formula for w:<br />

w =<br />

98<br />

15 qa5 b<br />

E + t3 1<br />

1 − (µ + ) 2 F+ + E−t 3 2<br />

1 − (µ − F−<br />

) 2<br />

(x 2 − a 2 ) 2�� �<br />

y 2 �<br />

+ 1 , (39)<br />

4b<br />

where t1 <strong>and</strong> t2 are known <strong>and</strong> may be obtained from (14). The maximum deflection takes place at the<br />

midpoints <strong>of</strong> the two free sides, that is, while x = 0 <strong>and</strong> y = ±b, we have<br />

wmax =<br />

833<br />

120 qa9 b<br />

E + t3 1<br />

1 − (µ + ) 2 F+ + E−t 3 2<br />

1 − (µ − F−<br />

) 2<br />

4. Comparisons <strong>and</strong> discussions<br />

. (40)<br />

4.1. Comparisons with FEM based on Ambartsumyan’s model. The bimodular problem attributes nonlinearity<br />

to materials. Since existent commercial FEM programs do not include the bimodular materials<br />

model proposed by Ambartsumyan, it is necessary to work out a numerical program based on an iterative<br />

technique. Because the stress state <strong>of</strong> the point in question is unknown in advance, we have to begin with<br />

a single modulus problem, thus gaining the initial stress state to form a corresponding elasticity matrix<br />

for each element. Generally, direct iterative methods based on an incrementally e<strong>vol</strong>ving stiffness have<br />

been adopted by many researchers.<br />

Based on an incrementally e<strong>vol</strong>ving stiffness, Gao et al. [1998] analyzed a bimodular thin plate by<br />

the direct iterative method. In the FEM analysis, the elements <strong>of</strong> the plate should be layered along the<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> the plate thickness <strong>and</strong> each layer may be considered as being in the same stress state.<br />

A rectangular thin plate fixed at its two longer sides is under the action <strong>of</strong> normal uniformly-distributed<br />

loads, as shown in Figure 5. For convenience, all the quantities are taken as dimensionless, specifically,<br />

the plate thickness is 0.24, the length <strong>and</strong> width <strong>of</strong> the plate are 8 <strong>and</strong> 6, respectively, <strong>and</strong> the intensity <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!