22.09.2017 Views

Magazine_BEAST_2017_Edition_8_complet

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

64<br />

#Science | Green<br />

THE ORIGINS OF<br />

CIRCULAR ECONOMY<br />

WITH DR. STAHEL<br />

BY ALEXANDRE<br />

KEILMANN<br />

Swiss architect and industrial analyst Walter R. Stahel is known as<br />

one of the Founding Fathers of Circular Economy and for coining<br />

the expression «cradle-to-cradle». On October 19 th , he will share<br />

his vision and knowledge during the 7 th edition of the Luxembourg<br />

Green Innovation Summit. <strong>BEAST</strong> met with Dr Stahel to discuss<br />

sustainable development strategies and his best practices.<br />

For more than 40 years, you have been promoting circular economy, notably<br />

through repairing and remanufacturing. How did industry professionals first<br />

react to the change of mindset?<br />

Circularity has been the functioning principle of nature since the Big Bang,<br />

and is as old as mankind, but for the first millennia it was one of poverty and<br />

scarcity. “Use it up, wear it out, make it do or do without”.<br />

The modern circular economy for manufactured objects is industrial and<br />

one of abundance. The drivers now are personal motivation of people, not<br />

necessity. The existing example of reuse, buying and selling used goods are<br />

so integrated into society that we do not see them. Have you ever bought or<br />

exchanged a NEW banknote? All of them are second-hand objects, polluted<br />

with traces of drugs and bacteria.<br />

The obstacles of change are not industry professionals but economists.<br />

They simply cannot imagine that used goods are cheaper and better than<br />

newly manufactured ones – because they only know manufacturing -<br />

remanufacturing is as well researched as the backside of the moon. Examples<br />

like Xerox, Caterpillar, Michelin and Rolls-Royce have shown that you need a<br />

holistic understanding of business to see the higher competitiveness of the<br />

circular economy, which breaking out of (the comfort of) silo-thinking. People<br />

also need good reasons why they should shift from optimising value chain<br />

process up to the Point of Sale, to optimising the use of stocks of objects over<br />

their full product-life. This implies a radical change of management objectives<br />

from flows to stocks, and from value added to value maintained!<br />

From the first initiatives of companies to today’s sustainable development<br />

strategies, which strategies proved to be more efficient? And why?<br />

The most efficient corporate strategy in shifting to more sustainable business<br />

models is selling performance, selling goods as a service. This business model<br />

enables companies to exploit sufficiency as well as efficiency strategies and<br />

develop new systems solutions, in addition to all circular economy options.<br />

In exchange for retaining the ownership of their goods and the embodied<br />

resources, they gain resource security with regard to the future availability<br />

and prices of resources. And these companies have to internalise all costs of<br />

future liabilities, risks and waste; as a result, societal sustainability increases<br />

because the companies have a strong financial incentive to take measures to<br />

prevent waste and losses by managing risks on systems level.<br />

While some countries acknowledge the fact of<br />

reducing waste and carbon emission, others<br />

tend to keep a blindfold. How would you<br />

convince political leaders to engage and adapt<br />

in a sustainable-circular economy strategy?<br />

Originally, economics has been the driver<br />

of the circular economy. Reuse, repair and<br />

remanufacturing helped owners of objects to<br />

reduce the costs of using them. Ever increasing<br />

waste volumes brought political leaders into<br />

the game for environmental protection reasons.<br />

The political solution was waste management,<br />

recycling, getting rid of the waste problem.<br />

But the circular economy is about preserving<br />

resources, natural, human, cultural and<br />

manufactured assets, a holistic optimisation<br />

involving loops, people, economics and speed.<br />

Material recycling is only a sustainable option if<br />

we succeed in recovering atoms and molecules<br />

to the same purity as new resources.<br />

The loop axiom says that the smaller the loops,<br />

the more profitable they are: reuse before repair<br />

before remanufacture before recycling; and local<br />

before regional before global.<br />

People are a renewable resource, and the<br />

only one with a qualitative edge. The circular<br />

economy substitutes manpower for energy, on<br />

a micro- and macroeconomic scale. Introducing<br />

the circular economy on a national level would<br />

reduce GHG emissions by 66%, and increase<br />

employment by 4%, according to latest research<br />

reports.<br />

<strong>BEAST</strong> MAGAZINE #8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!