- Page 1 and 2: Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conferenc
- Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents Asudeh, Ash 1-18
- Page 5 and 6: The Syntax of Preverbal Particles a
- Page 7 and 8: 2 The Problem: Five Conflicting Cla
- Page 9: (10) CP C ′ XP CP XP The outermos
- Page 13 and 14: 1-3, unless problematic assumptions
- Page 15 and 16: (4c) *After [IP last year [IP she r
- Page 17 and 18: The adjunction rule (36) does not b
- Page 19 and 20: (8c) chun isteacht duit [CP[CP nuai
- Page 21 and 22: work on non-projecting categories a
- Page 23 and 24: Coordination and Parallelism in Glu
- Page 25 and 26: Traditional Linear Duplication a, a
- Page 27 and 28: (8) fred : fe see : fe ⊸ je ⊸ s
- Page 29 and 30: us add the following additional con
- Page 31 and 32: 3.2 A General Semantic Schema for C
- Page 33 and 34: approach also achieves correct resu
- Page 35 and 36: In summary, to show that two deriva
- Page 37 and 38: Extraction possible from initial (p
- Page 39 and 40: 5.3.2 Across-the-Board Extraction T
- Page 41 and 42: Asudeh, Ash (in progress). Resumpti
- Page 43 and 44: Montague, Richard (1974). Formal ph
- Page 45 and 46: Abstract VP-chaining in Oriya (an I
- Page 47 and 48: (3) haata dho-i bhaata khaa-i mun s
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 4. Schematic representation
- Page 51 and 52: the medicine is applied. If overtly
- Page 53 and 54: The control equation in (13) establ
- Page 55 and 56: intervening object and thus ‘kept
- Page 57 and 58: Lexicon L(1): khi-aa-ga-laa: V L(2)
- Page 59 and 60: (20) VP -> VP V' α � *α SIT-IND
- Page 61 and 62:
CONSTRAINT SYMMETRY IN OPTIMALITY T
- Page 63 and 64:
‘Juan hit that dog with a stick
- Page 65 and 66:
‘With what did Juan hit the dog?
- Page 67 and 68:
The unexpectedly bad candidate is (
- Page 69 and 70:
Amharic (Semitic, Ethiopia) is a pr
- Page 71 and 72:
31) Wïšša-w bä=Daniel bet atäg
- Page 73 and 74:
A functional PP must contain a head
- Page 75 and 76:
appear): A less well known example
- Page 77 and 78:
appear on the non-recursive side of
- Page 79 and 80:
Publications. Smith Stark, Thomas.
- Page 81 and 82:
Abstract The development of large c
- Page 83 and 84:
subj : spec : det : pred : the head
- Page 85 and 86:
could annotate the CFG rules extrac
- Page 87 and 88:
strings in the WSJ section of the P
- Page 89 and 90:
Annotation coverage is measured in
- Page 91 and 92:
Our grammars are extracted from sec
- Page 93 and 94:
Penn-II training set is discarded f
- Page 95 and 96:
grammatical functions are more akin
- Page 97 and 98:
forms to semi-automatically develop
- Page 99 and 100:
Predicate Argument Structure. In: P
- Page 101 and 102:
Abstract PARTITIVE NOUN PHRASES IN
- Page 103 and 104:
possessive partitives in (7) and (8
- Page 105 and 106:
Extraction of constituents of dativ
- Page 107 and 108:
iológiát [[az egyik-en]NP __ ]NP
- Page 109 and 110:
Unlike post-verbal constituent orde
- Page 111 and 112:
uncertainty. Adopting this idea, I
- Page 113 and 114:
accounts for genitive possessor nou
- Page 115 and 116:
(38) Hungarian TOPIC/SCOPE/FOCUS pa
- Page 117 and 118:
The rule in (41) shows that the top
- Page 119 and 120:
Payne, John and Erika Chisarik. (20
- Page 121 and 122:
�����������
- Page 123 and 124:
�����������
- Page 125 and 126:
�����������
- Page 127 and 128:
�����������
- Page 129 and 130:
�����������
- Page 131 and 132:
�����������
- Page 133 and 134:
�����������
- Page 135 and 136:
GETARUN PARSER Rodolfo Delmonte Abs
- Page 137 and 138:
vital aid in the actual development
- Page 139 and 140:
levels of representations required
- Page 141 and 142:
sentence starts with a verb we let
- Page 143 and 144:
adjunct_cp negat pro=CLI, {Case=acc
- Page 145 and 146:
4. Parsing Strategies and P
- Page 147 and 148:
qualified. The following list of pr
- Page 149 and 150:
structure rules, after the head has
- Page 151 and 152:
subordinators, and to arguments of
- Page 153 and 154:
Hobbs J.R., D.E.Appelt, J.Bear, M.T
- Page 155 and 156:
SECTION II: ITALIAN TEXTS o La stor
- Page 157 and 158:
Mario criticava luigi perché ha ro
- Page 159 and 160:
1. Introduction Since the beginning
- Page 161 and 162:
. ⎡FOCUS ⎤ ⎢PRED ‘wonder (
- Page 163 and 164:
(12) *ng- oingerang a mlarngii a be
- Page 165 and 166:
(17) a. Hine ha- simla še kaniti.
- Page 167 and 168:
have resumptive pronouns. Under the
- Page 169 and 170:
way to license the same f-structure
- Page 171 and 172:
(33) a. Robin met the man that/who
- Page 173 and 174:
licensed in the normal way by funct
- Page 175 and 176:
description of the situation. Borer
- Page 177 and 178:
http://cslipublications.stanford.ed
- Page 179 and 180:
A (Discourse) Functional Analysis o
- Page 181 and 182:
A multi-factorial LFG analysis of a
- Page 183 and 184:
(9) CP (↑ SUBJ)= ↓ ↑=↓ NP C
- Page 185 and 186:
Word Order Properties SGF coordinat
- Page 187 and 188:
4.1 Asymmetric Analyses Heycock and
- Page 189 and 190:
(25) (a) S 〈 der Jäger ging in d
- Page 191 and 192:
In sum, the Subject Functor Lineari
- Page 193 and 194:
first and second conjunct are disti
- Page 195 and 196:
In the Glue Semantics approach (see
- Page 197 and 198:
In the optimality-based model, mism
- Page 199 and 200:
complementiser (COMPL) may be exten
- Page 201 and 202:
BULGARIAN WORD ORDER AND THE ROLE O
- Page 203 and 204:
Bulgarian word order and the role o
- Page 205 and 206:
Bulgarian word order and the role o
- Page 207 and 208:
Bulgarian word order and the role o
- Page 209 and 210:
Bulgarian word order and the role o
- Page 211 and 212:
Bulgarian word order and the role o
- Page 213 and 214:
Bulgarian word order and the role o
- Page 215 and 216:
Bulgarian word order and the role o
- Page 217 and 218:
Bulgarian word order and the role o
- Page 219 and 220:
Bulgarian word order and the role o
- Page 221 and 222:
Bulgarian word order and the role o
- Page 223 and 224:
Bulgarian word order and the role o
- Page 225 and 226:
1 Introduction This paper deals wit
- Page 227 and 228:
(4) To nifiko itan raf-to (*apo ton
- Page 229 and 230:
That is, in example (6) the partici
- Page 231 and 232:
(22) To spiti fenotan egataleli-men
- Page 233 and 234:
state denoted by the adjective appe
- Page 235 and 236:
in Modern Greek bears the intrinsic
- Page 237 and 238:
In addition, the lexical representa
- Page 239 and 240:
In this way, we capture the intuiti
- Page 241 and 242:
(57) To fagito ine magire-meno/*mag
- Page 243 and 244:
Corpus-based Learning in Stochastic
- Page 245 and 246:
LFG02 - Kuhn: Corpus-based Learning
- Page 247 and 248:
LFG02 - Kuhn: Corpus-based Learning
- Page 249 and 250:
LFG02 - Kuhn: Corpus-based Learning
- Page 251 and 252:
LFG02 - Kuhn: Corpus-based Learning
- Page 253 and 254:
LFG02 - Kuhn: Corpus-based Learning
- Page 255 and 256:
LFG02 - Kuhn: Corpus-based Learning
- Page 257 and 258:
LFG02 - Kuhn: Corpus-based Learning
- Page 259 and 260:
LFG02 - Kuhn: Corpus-based Learning
- Page 261 and 262:
LFG02 - Kuhn: Corpus-based Learning
- Page 263 and 264:
1. Introduction In this paper I wil
- Page 265 and 266:
This strategy has been outlined by
- Page 267 and 268:
The essence of the new approach is
- Page 269 and 270:
3.2. Control relations in Hungarian
- Page 271 and 272:
complements of the postposition ut
- Page 273 and 274:
offered a more detailed discussion,
- Page 275 and 276:
lexical form which argument of this
- Page 277 and 278:
Berkeley. pp. 18. (On-line publicat
- Page 279 and 280:
0. Abstract This paper attempts to
- Page 281 and 282:
'understand', oppgi 'state', opplev
- Page 283 and 284:
This property of raising to object
- Page 285 and 286:
(32) ved/fra å svømme by/from to
- Page 287 and 288:
(45) *Til å sove ser han ut to (PR
- Page 289 and 290:
(57) Å gjøre det er blitt tenkt p
- Page 291 and 292:
Second argument: The preposition do
- Page 293 and 294:
In Lødrup (2002), I show that most
- Page 295 and 296:
Teleman, Ulf, Staffan Hellberg and
- Page 297 and 298:
Abstract Majority of Bantu language
- Page 299 and 300:
No Object Agreement Bresnan and Mch
- Page 301 and 302:
(7) a. N-ä-ï- `m-lyì-á k-èlyá
- Page 303 and 304:
epresent 72% of the total of 312 se
- Page 305 and 306:
We can characterize more concretely
- Page 307 and 308:
(19) Markedness Subhierarchies a. *
- Page 309 and 310:
4.1 Hierarchy of Morphological Feat
- Page 311 and 312:
(30) Harmonic Alignment of (28) wit
- Page 313 and 314:
topic-anaphoricity (as a bound pron
- Page 315 and 316:
the present analysis highlights the
- Page 317 and 318:
Grimshaw, Jane. 2001. Economy of st
- Page 319 and 320:
CLITICS AND PHRASAL AFFIXATION IN C
- Page 321 and 322:
(2) (a) ...wedi eu gweld nhw. ASP C
- Page 323 and 324:
(7) IP (↑GF) = ↓ ↑ = ↓ NP I
- Page 325 and 326:
(14) (a) Jovan je čitao knjigu. Jo
- Page 327 and 328:
The Principle of Morphological Comp
- Page 329 and 330:
3.2 Serbian Pronominal Clitics A se
- Page 331 and 332:
Example (35) has the c-structure in
- Page 333 and 334:
(43) (a) čovek-: N (↑PRED) = ‘
- Page 335 and 336:
(52) (a) jučer: N (ADJ↑) (↑PRE
- Page 337 and 338:
Case Marking and Subject Extraction
- Page 339 and 340:
objects occur in VP or in I (“obj
- Page 341 and 342:
Coordinated structures (14) Peter o
- Page 343 and 344:
(20) Han hadde de trodd e ville kom
- Page 345 and 346:
(28) a. * Peter forventer [I’ [I
- Page 347 and 348:
One disadvantage of this approach i
- Page 349 and 350:
6.2 Case Assignment and Empty Categ
- Page 351 and 352:
Lets us consider the binding condit
- Page 353 and 354:
claims that subject extraction is n
- Page 355 and 356:
ham: N ( (SUBJ £ ) ¡ ((COMP SUBJ
- Page 357 and 358:
[Vikner and Schwartz, 1996] Vikner,
- Page 359 and 360:
. Mary-ka ttal-lul sakwa-lul mek-I-
- Page 361 and 362:
In (4a), the object of the simple d
- Page 363 and 364:
3. Morphological Causatives in Kore
- Page 365 and 366:
. Mary-ka ttal-pakkey sakwa-ul an m
- Page 367 and 368:
Firstly, objects in MC are asymmetr
- Page 369 and 370:
The asymmetries of double accusativ
- Page 371 and 372:
Abstract The paper describes a pres
- Page 373 and 374:
construction - in good style. • I
- Page 375 and 376:
Figure 4: Attributed adjectives (
- Page 377 and 378:
Aspects of the syntax of psychologi
- Page 379 and 380:
Despite the syntactic differences e
- Page 381 and 382:
e. (exists independently of the eve
- Page 383 and 384:
(10) Poco a poco, me enfadó que pe
- Page 385 and 386:
to (3), we can thematically charact
- Page 387 and 388:
we can derive the grammatical funct
- Page 389 and 390:
‘This book interests him (John).
- Page 391 and 392:
unaccusative verb, while interesar
- Page 393 and 394:
Roegiest, E. (1999). Objet direct p
- Page 395 and 396:
Abstract The aim of this paper is t
- Page 397 and 398:
(6) Pierre lui a fait écrire une l
- Page 399 and 400:
dative NPs that the examples (4) to
- Page 401 and 402:
verb. In some languages, like Engli
- Page 403 and 404:
(15) *J’ai convaincu de lui tél
- Page 405 and 406:
VP � V + V + (NP) + (PP) (��
- Page 407 and 408:
a number of signs (words or phrases
- Page 409 and 410:
��� �� � �� ��
- Page 411 and 412:
DAVIS, A. & P.-J. KOENIG (2000) Lin
- Page 413 and 414:
1. Introduction Subsumption and Equ
- Page 415 and 416:
an XCOMP attribute whose value is t
- Page 417 and 418:
(8) a. S|VP Æ NP* (V’) ( S|VP )
- Page 419 and 420:
inconsistency with erzählen. But i
- Page 421 and 422:
We revise the fronted S|VP expansio
- Page 423 and 424:
5. The interaction between PVPF and
- Page 425 and 426:
(28) Ein Aussenseiter versuchte hie
- Page 427 and 428:
. * Ein Aussenseiter gewonnen haben
- Page 429 and 430:
The use of subsumption addresses fu
- Page 431 and 432:
TIGER TRANSFER Utilizing LFG Parses
- Page 433 and 434:
is an additional way of ensuring co
- Page 435 and 436:
"tiger_4548: Hier herrscht Demokrat
- Page 437 and 438:
y a multi-set of OT marks, thereby
- Page 439 and 440:
sumably they cannot be fixed in pri
- Page 441 and 442:
¢¡¤£¦¥¦§©¨�£¦§�¥
- Page 443 and 444:
Macros and Templates The system all
- Page 445 and 446:
Ambiguous Predicates A simple examp
- Page 447 and 448:
HD−OUT TI−FORM herrscht, TI−M
- Page 449 and 450:
(ignoring PP-attachment for the eva
- Page 451:
Kameyama, Megumi, Ryo Ochitani, and