24.02.2013 Views

Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conference National Technical - CSLI ...

Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conference National Technical - CSLI ...

Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conference National Technical - CSLI ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e. (exists independently <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> event named by <strong>the</strong> verb)<br />

(5) Contributing properties for <strong>the</strong> Patient Proto-Role:<br />

a. undergoes change <strong>of</strong> state<br />

b. incremental <strong>the</strong>me<br />

c. causally affected by ano<strong>the</strong>r participant<br />

d. stationary relative to movement <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r participant<br />

e. (does not exist independently <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> event, or not at all)<br />

The linking <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se proto-roles with <strong>the</strong> grammatical functions follows <strong>the</strong> Argu-<br />

ment Selection Principle (Dowty 1991: 576):<br />

In predicates with grammatical subject and object, <strong>the</strong> argument<br />

for which <strong>the</strong> predicate entails <strong>the</strong> greatest number <strong>of</strong> Proto-Agent<br />

properties will be lexicalized as <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> predicate; <strong>the</strong> ar-<br />

gument having <strong>the</strong> greatest number <strong>of</strong> Proto-Patient entailments will<br />

be lexicalized as <strong>the</strong> direct object.<br />

Independently <strong>of</strong> my approach and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data I want to account for, Dowty’s lists<br />

<strong>of</strong> proto-role properties seem to be insufficient to account for all types <strong>of</strong> verbs.<br />

Indeed, Dowty himself presents <strong>the</strong>se lists as only provisional. On <strong>the</strong> one hand<br />

<strong>the</strong> two lists <strong>of</strong> properties are ra<strong>the</strong>r heterogeneous, and on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

don’t seem to cover all <strong>the</strong>matically relevant semantic distinctions. O<strong>the</strong>r authors<br />

also have tried to extend Dowty’s lists with new properties. Ackerman and Moore<br />

(1999, 2001), for instance, add <strong>the</strong> property <strong>of</strong> being a telic entity to <strong>the</strong> list <strong>of</strong><br />

proto-patient properties; as a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, my modification <strong>of</strong> Dowty’s <strong>the</strong>ory<br />

will resemble to a certain extent that <strong>of</strong> Ackerman and Moore.<br />

However, it is difficult to exactly classify <strong>the</strong> different kinds <strong>of</strong> psychological<br />

verbs from an aspectual point <strong>of</strong> view, or from <strong>the</strong> point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir “Akti-<br />

onsart”: at least <strong>the</strong> frighten-type verbs don’t seem to fit exactly in none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

aspectual classes distinguished for instance by Vendler (1967). Although many<br />

authors classify <strong>the</strong>se verbs ei<strong>the</strong>r as achievements or as accomplishments, some-<br />

times implicitly, by characterizing <strong>the</strong>m as causative or as telic verbs, <strong>the</strong>y don’t<br />

377

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!