24.02.2013 Views

Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conference National Technical - CSLI ...

Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conference National Technical - CSLI ...

Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conference National Technical - CSLI ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Jaeger & Gerassimova 20<strong>02</strong><br />

c-structure 4 f-structure 4<br />

To sum up, <strong>the</strong> island data presented above is not only compatible with our <strong>the</strong>ory but also<br />

predicted by it. In <strong>the</strong> next and final section, we summarize our analysis and list some open<br />

questions.<br />

VII Conclusions and Outlook<br />

We have shown how two functions/uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> DOC interact. The DOC is a grammatical (direct<br />

object) agreement marker and <strong>the</strong> default pronoun <strong>of</strong> Bulgarian. In contrast to <strong>the</strong> object marker in<br />

Chiche� ���������§�����������������������������������©���¡������������������������������������������������������������������� -structure<br />

TOPIC but an IS-topic. This insight helps to position <strong>the</strong> DOC within a typology <strong>of</strong> (object)<br />

markers. The DOC's object topic-marking function, in interaction with <strong>the</strong> proposed annotated<br />

phrase structure rules (i.e. especially <strong>the</strong> functional control <strong>of</strong> fronted topic), accounts for both<br />

obligatory TOPICalized object doubling and optional doubling <strong>of</strong> topical objects in general.<br />

Our account stresses that linguistic forms can have several (independent) functions. This is<br />

even more evident when we consider that <strong>the</strong> DOC has a third function as intrusive pronoun, as<br />

mentioned in <strong>the</strong> introduction. First results <strong>of</strong> an ongoing online experiment on <strong>the</strong> intrusive<br />

pronoun DOC in extractions support our analysis. Those results will have to be fully incorporated<br />

into a complete account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> DOC.<br />

The optionality <strong>of</strong> CD in many contexts shows that speakers have different options <strong>of</strong> coding<br />

e.g. a topical object depending on <strong>the</strong> register, genre and maybe o<strong>the</strong>r factors (see Leafgren 1997a,<br />

2001, 20<strong>02</strong> for a similar thought). Possible generalizations relating <strong>the</strong> choice <strong>of</strong> forms to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

functions and o<strong>the</strong>r factors, such as register, merit fur<strong>the</strong>r investigation. For example, does <strong>the</strong><br />

absence <strong>of</strong> intonation in written language enforce <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> alternative linguistic means (such as<br />

more strict case marking in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rwise optional case marking, or more strict word order)<br />

to identify GFs and DFs.<br />

214

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!