24.02.2013 Views

25th International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry IMOG 2011

25th International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry IMOG 2011

25th International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry IMOG 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

O-77<br />

Fluid API gravity predicti<strong>on</strong> in basin modelling<br />

Rolando di Primio 1 , Eric Lehne 1 , Philipp Kuhn 1 , Friedemann Baur 2 , Brian Horsfield 1<br />

1 GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, 2 RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany<br />

(corresp<strong>on</strong>ding author:dipri@gfz-potsdam.de)<br />

Kinetic models of petroleum generati<strong>on</strong> are the<br />

standard tool for the predicti<strong>on</strong> of hydrocarb<strong>on</strong><br />

distributi<strong>on</strong> and properties using basin modelling.<br />

Such models are based <strong>on</strong> laboratory analysis of<br />

hydrocarb<strong>on</strong> generati<strong>on</strong> and extrapolati<strong>on</strong> of the<br />

reacti<strong>on</strong>s characterised to geologic heating rates. Our<br />

compositi<strong>on</strong>al kinetic approach is termed<br />

PhaseKinetics (di Primio, R., Horsfield, B. (2006)<br />

AAPG Bull. 90, 1031-1058), and is based <strong>on</strong> a<br />

combinati<strong>on</strong> of bulk kinetics and closed system<br />

pyrolysis experiments to describe the compositi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

evoluti<strong>on</strong> of generated fluids as a functi<strong>on</strong> of<br />

increasing maturity. Due to the compositi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

resoluti<strong>on</strong> used, which is based <strong>on</strong> that of PVT data<br />

formats, the predicti<strong>on</strong> of petroleum phase properties<br />

is possible.<br />

The predicti<strong>on</strong> of phase properties of evolving<br />

fluids, while successful with respect to GOR,<br />

saturati<strong>on</strong> pressures and phase state, lacked an API<br />

gravity predictive capacity. Here we present results<br />

from the GFZ project Predicting Petroleum Quality in<br />

which this topic was addressed.<br />

API gravity of petroleum fluids is generally assumed<br />

to increase with increasing fluid maturity. Accordingly<br />

trends of increasing fluid maturity, e.g. based <strong>on</strong><br />

biomarker parameters or physical properties such as<br />

GOR, are expected to correlate to API gravity. Such<br />

trends have been reported in the literature, however<br />

they are <strong>on</strong>ly obvious in large data sets which include<br />

a large variety of primary and sec<strong>on</strong>dary fluids. When<br />

we exclude altered fluids from such trends, e.g. the<br />

biodegraded fluids as well as the gas c<strong>on</strong>densates<br />

which usually c<strong>on</strong>tain gas generated by sec<strong>on</strong>dary<br />

cracking processes, a correlati<strong>on</strong> between API gravity<br />

and maturity is very difficult to ascertain. For oilwindow<br />

mature oils we generally observe <strong>on</strong>ly a very<br />

vague correlati<strong>on</strong> of API gravity and maturity, or n<strong>on</strong>e<br />

at all. However, in genetically related fluids a range of<br />

API gravities is comm<strong>on</strong>, usually showing a Gaussian<br />

distributi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> an extensive oil dataset, including fluids<br />

generated by source rocks from distinctly different<br />

depositi<strong>on</strong>al envir<strong>on</strong>ments, we have been able to<br />

identify characteristic API gravity ranges for<br />

respective source rock types. By linking source rock<br />

petroleum type organofacies and kerogen type, as<br />

determined by open system PyGC, to generated fluid<br />

API ranges we developed an approach for the<br />

predicti<strong>on</strong> of initial fluid API gravity using the<br />

PhaseKinetic approach.<br />

Our natural datasets indicated that typical<br />

Paraffinic-Naphthenic-Aromatic (PNA) petroleums<br />

show API gravity ranges between 32° and 46°,<br />

centering around 39°API; Paraffinic-High-Wax (P-HW)<br />

petroleums range from 35° to 50° and with a<br />

maximum at 43°API, light oils range from 35 to 46 and<br />

maximise at 42°API and sulphur-rich oils (PNA S-rich)<br />

have the broadest API gravity range from 19 to 42<br />

with a weak maximum at 29°API. Each of the<br />

petroleum types described can be linked to a specific<br />

source rock depositi<strong>on</strong>al envir<strong>on</strong>ment using PyGC<br />

analysis of the source rock.<br />

Our PhaseKinetic approach uses a 14 compound<br />

model of the generated petroleum which includes the<br />

physical properties of each individual compound in<br />

order to be able to calculate the phase behaviour of<br />

the generated fluids. While the physical properties of<br />

the compounds in original models were c<strong>on</strong>stant for<br />

any fluid type, we have now generated liquid<br />

compound physical property descripti<strong>on</strong>s for four<br />

different fluid types: PNA, PNA S-rich, P-HW and light<br />

oils and gas c<strong>on</strong>densates. In additi<strong>on</strong> to the<br />

characterisati<strong>on</strong> of the primary fluid properties<br />

generated by the respective source rocks during<br />

maturati<strong>on</strong>, the changes during maturati<strong>on</strong> and<br />

cracking were also characterised and included in the<br />

model using compound specific sec<strong>on</strong>dary cracking<br />

descripti<strong>on</strong>s. This new approach was tested <strong>on</strong> a<br />

variety of petroleum system models including a North<br />

Sea area and the Willist<strong>on</strong> Basin with excellent<br />

results.<br />

139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!