24.02.2013 Views

25th International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry IMOG 2011

25th International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry IMOG 2011

25th International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry IMOG 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

O-11<br />

Sulfur Rich Petroleum Systems: TSR and thermal cracking in<br />

basin and reservoir field studies, simulati<strong>on</strong> experiments and<br />

model calibrati<strong>on</strong><br />

Olaf G. Podlaha, Henning Peters, Erdem Idiz, Volker Dieckmann<br />

Shell Global Soluti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> B.V., Rijswijk, Netherlands (corresp<strong>on</strong>ding<br />

author:olaf.podlaha@shell.com)<br />

Charge modelling and fluid property predicti<strong>on</strong> in<br />

petroleum system analysis relies <strong>on</strong> the integrati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

field observati<strong>on</strong>s, appropriate simulati<strong>on</strong> experiments<br />

and risk reducti<strong>on</strong> using up-to-date in-house modeling<br />

tools. In complex systems such as Sulfur and its<br />

inorganic and organic species in a petroleum system,<br />

this approach allows us to accurately assess of a set<br />

of key questi<strong>on</strong>s:<br />

- How to model naturally observed Sulfur phases‘<br />

variability as a result of (a) thermal cracking of<br />

OM and (b) TSR processes ?<br />

- How to model laboratory simulati<strong>on</strong> experiments?<br />

- How to use simulati<strong>on</strong> experimental results for<br />

generic process modeling?<br />

- Which c<strong>on</strong>straints from field studies will always<br />

be needed to crosscheck models?<br />

- Will modeling go bey<strong>on</strong>d main fluid properties‘<br />

predicti<strong>on</strong> and allow for rec<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> of OM S<br />

exchange reacti<strong>on</strong>s?<br />

- Where is the boundary between a basin modeling<br />

approach versus enhanced reservoir modeling<br />

within the rock and brine framework?<br />

In this study, a series of stacked Upper Dev<strong>on</strong>ian to<br />

Mississippian sour gas reservoirs situated in the<br />

Rocky Mountains Foothills of Alberta, Canada, serve<br />

as natural labs. The Western Canadian Sedimentary<br />

Basin (WCSB) is <strong>on</strong>e of the most studied hydrocarb<strong>on</strong><br />

provinces in the world. Producti<strong>on</strong> from these<br />

reservoir units is mainly dry gas and different forms<br />

sulfur, with H2S c<strong>on</strong>tents ranging from 5% to almost<br />

90% were studied. As a supplement, a Middle to<br />

Upper Dev<strong>on</strong>ian c<strong>on</strong>densate-sour gas reservoir (with<br />

more than 35% H2S) in the Plains of Alberta was<br />

investigated.<br />

The field data studies [1] were supported<br />

- Petrography (microscopy) of limest<strong>on</strong>e and<br />

dolost<strong>on</strong>e in the petroleum reservoirs units<br />

- Geochemical characterizati<strong>on</strong> of solid bitumen<br />

using elemental analysis and X-ray absorpti<strong>on</strong><br />

spectroscopy (XANES)<br />

- Carb<strong>on</strong>, oxygen and sulfur isotope analyses of<br />

various phases<br />

- Fluid inclusi<strong>on</strong> studies using classic<br />

microthermometry analysis and Raman<br />

spectrometry for semiquantitative gas typing.<br />

The results of this field study [1] were supplemented<br />

by simulati<strong>on</strong> experiments performing closed goldtube<br />

pyrolysis to study the kinetics of both S-rich and<br />

S-free OM thermal cracking in source rocks as well as<br />

S-rich and S-free oil for a comparis<strong>on</strong> of normal oil-togas-cracking<br />

(OTGC) versus TSR c<strong>on</strong>trolled OTGC.<br />

For OM thermal cracking it will be dem<strong>on</strong>strated that<br />

the activati<strong>on</strong> energies described in the literature for<br />

hydreous and open pyrolysis experiments [2], [3]<br />

differ from those obtained for gold tube pyrolysis,<br />

though the general trend to lower activati<strong>on</strong>s energies<br />

with increasing sulfur yield of the organic matter still<br />

holds.<br />

For TSR the role of catalysts such as Mg as well as<br />

the importance of presence of different sulfur species<br />

types for the <strong>on</strong>set and degree of TSR induced<br />

hydrocarb<strong>on</strong> alterati<strong>on</strong> as described in the literature<br />

[4] will be shown in experiment and model results.<br />

The simulati<strong>on</strong> experiments furthermore suggest that<br />

for higher maturities sulfur back-reacti<strong>on</strong> at enhanced<br />

TSR levels into aromatic hydrocarb<strong>on</strong> fracti<strong>on</strong> allow<br />

for the distincti<strong>on</strong> of reactive and pyro-bitumen<br />

forming hydrocarb<strong>on</strong> species.<br />

As an outlook the importance of these results for the<br />

modeling and predicti<strong>on</strong> of fluid properties in S rich<br />

petroleum systems will be dem<strong>on</strong>strated.<br />

References<br />

[1] Peters et al. (<strong>2011</strong>), this abstract volume<br />

[2] Lewan and Ruble (2002), Org. Geochem., 33,<br />

1457-1475<br />

[3] Baskin and Peters (1992), AAPG Bull., 76, 1-13.<br />

[4] Zhang et al. (2007), Org. Geochem., 38, 897-910<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!