24.02.2013 Views

25th International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry IMOG 2011

25th International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry IMOG 2011

25th International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry IMOG 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P-319<br />

The study of C1-C3 gas generati<strong>on</strong> behavior of kerogen by<br />

closed-system thermal simulati<strong>on</strong> and Py-GC<br />

Yuh<strong>on</strong>g Liao, Xuny<strong>on</strong>g Zhu, Ans<strong>on</strong>g Geng, Yinhua Pan<br />

Guangzhou Institute of <strong>Geochemistry</strong>, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China (corresp<strong>on</strong>ding<br />

author:liaoyh@gig.ac.cn)<br />

In closed thermal simulati<strong>on</strong> system, the C1 directly<br />

generated by kerogen was mixed with C1 generated<br />

by oil cracking. It is hard to eliminate the actual gas<br />

generati<strong>on</strong> behavior of kerogen. In this research,<br />

kerogen was heated at two rates, 20ºC/h and 2 ºC /h<br />

in a closed system from 350 ºC to 600 ºC. The<br />

volume of C1, C2 and C3 was measured and weight<br />

normalized. C<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong>s of C1, C2 and C3 were<br />

calculated based <strong>on</strong> gas generated (c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> in<br />

Fig. 1(a)). Then the reacted kerogens were<br />

pyrolyzated by Py-GC at 800 ºC for 10s to study the<br />

residual C1, C2 and C3 potential of kerogen. The real<br />

c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> rates of C1, C2 and C3 of kerogen were<br />

calculated based <strong>on</strong> residual rates of c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong><br />

(c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> in Fig. 1(b)). The thermal maturities of<br />

kerogen were calculated based <strong>on</strong> Easy Ro<br />

(Sweeney et al., 2000). The c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong>s measured<br />

were plotted against calculated Ro.<br />

The Py-GC results indicated that more than 90% of<br />

C1, C2 and C3 potentials of kerogen were<br />

progressively c<strong>on</strong>sumed up before Ro% reach 1.3.<br />

While weight-normalized volume of C1, C2 and C3<br />

generated in closed system simulati<strong>on</strong> suggest that<br />

the generati<strong>on</strong> of C1, C2 and C3 extends to much<br />

higher maturity range. The generati<strong>on</strong> of C1 doesn‘t<br />

reach its end though Ro% reaches 3.0. So there<br />

exists dramatically difference in gas generati<strong>on</strong><br />

behavior between closed system and open system<br />

thermal simulati<strong>on</strong>. It is due to significant<br />

hydrocarb<strong>on</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>dary cracking in closed system<br />

thermal simulati<strong>on</strong>. Kerogen first releases<br />

hydrocarb<strong>on</strong>s with higher molecule weight during<br />

thermal maturati<strong>on</strong>, then these hydrocarb<strong>on</strong>s crack<br />

into smaller <strong>on</strong>es step by step and the final products<br />

are methane and pyrobitumen. Thus the generati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

methane can last very broad maturity range. In open<br />

system thermal simulati<strong>on</strong>, the alkyl side chains are<br />

released from structure of kerogen as volatile<br />

molecules and blown away, and there is no<br />

sec<strong>on</strong>dary cracking of hydrocarb<strong>on</strong>s during kerogen<br />

thermal maturati<strong>on</strong>. Most C1 can <strong>on</strong>ly be generated<br />

by the primary cracking.<br />

The experimental results also indicate that the<br />

distributi<strong>on</strong> of activati<strong>on</strong> energy (E) based <strong>on</strong> closed<br />

system pyrolysi are much higher than the distributi<strong>on</strong><br />

of activati<strong>on</strong> energy at identical frequency factor (A =<br />

1.0E+14). The average activati<strong>on</strong> energy of C1<br />

generati<strong>on</strong> is 62.53 kcal/mol in closed system<br />

pyrolysis, while average activati<strong>on</strong> energy of C1<br />

generati<strong>on</strong> is 52.75 kcal/mol. In open system<br />

pyrolysis, average activati<strong>on</strong> energy of C2 generati<strong>on</strong><br />

is 52.33 kcal/mol, and average activati<strong>on</strong> energy of<br />

C3 generati<strong>on</strong> is 49.78 kcal/mol. Average activati<strong>on</strong><br />

energy of C3 is much lower than C1. It indicated that<br />

C3 alkyl side chains are much easier to be broken<br />

apart from kerogen structure. It is c<strong>on</strong>sistent with<br />

comm<strong>on</strong> accepted rules of hydrocarb<strong>on</strong> generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Fig. 1 (a) C<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> of C1, C2 and C3 in closed system<br />

simulati<strong>on</strong> based <strong>on</strong> volume of gas generated; (b) Real<br />

c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> of C1, C2 and C3 of kerogen based <strong>on</strong> residual<br />

rate of c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> measured by Py-GC<br />

452

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!