02.03.2013 Views

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the BA evidence at the site <strong>of</strong> Ptolis-Gortsouli, despite the fact that this is the site <strong>of</strong> an<br />

Archaic and Classical sanctuary. This identification is aided by remains <strong>of</strong> a fortification wall<br />

as well as the definite break in the material record between the LBA and G material, except<br />

for one possible PG sherd (Howell 1970, n.11), preventing the inference <strong>of</strong> continuity <strong>of</strong><br />

function. At Orchomenos-Palaiopyrgos the ‘ancient sanctuary’ is situated over a BA<br />

habitation site and although the reports state that the Archaic shrine site has evidence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

religious nature dating from the LHIIIB (Spyropoulos 1982, pp.113-5; AR 1991-2, p.26) this<br />

may well be following a similar pattern to that at Ptolis-Gortsouli outlined above rather than<br />

indicative <strong>of</strong> continuity <strong>of</strong> religious practice. On the other hand, the evidence from this<br />

particular site may better fit the picture outlined by Mazarakis Ainian, where the division<br />

between domestic and sacred space within settlements is not sharply defined before the first<br />

half <strong>of</strong> the eighth century BCE (Mazarakis Ainian, 1997).<br />

An <strong>of</strong>ten-important indication <strong>of</strong> a site <strong>of</strong> religious significance is the presence <strong>of</strong> a structure<br />

identified as a ‘temple’, such as the apsidal buildings at Tegea (see no.2 in Renfrew’s list <strong>of</strong><br />

correlates, 1985, p.19). Traditionally the view has been that temples were not built until the G<br />

period (Morris, 1987; Whitley, 1993; Coldstream 2003, p.317), or at least until this time,<br />

sacred space was not strictly delineated. This has led to many early structures not being<br />

identified as having sacred significance when they may well have had (Mazarakis Ainian<br />

1997, p.393). Sourvinou-Inwood (1993, p.2) has challenged the traditional claim regarding<br />

the definition <strong>of</strong> religious space and believes that many Dark Age sacred places have been<br />

thus misinterpreted. The criteria Mazarakis Ainian (1997, ch. 2) gives for designating a<br />

building that <strong>of</strong> a chieftain very much coincides with what might be expected from a sacred<br />

building, such as great size or position, including proximity to open air sanctuaries. Even<br />

bronze artefacts such as tripods can be seen as either votive <strong>of</strong>ferings thus indicating a temple,<br />

or prizes belonging to the owner <strong>of</strong> the house and therefore signifying a chieftains dwelling<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!