02.03.2013 Views

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and Bradley (1991, p.212) suggests that to apply Annales notions, more refined chronologies<br />

than we have at present, are needed.<br />

However, although the different timescales are somewhat abstract notions and an `historian’s<br />

writing <strong>of</strong> periodicity` rather than `the experience <strong>of</strong> temporality` (Thomas 1996, p.35) they<br />

can provide a useful framework for thinking about the past. Other scholars, recognising that<br />

time can be seen on different levels, do mediate successfully between them. Giddens’<br />

Structuration theory (1984) also allows an investigation <strong>of</strong> different temporal levels (1984,<br />

1991). His analysis <strong>of</strong> society, <strong>of</strong> how structure is created by individuals, which in turn<br />

affects how people act, and his idea <strong>of</strong> a double hermeneutic – the understanding <strong>of</strong> the world<br />

at societal level and an understanding on an individual level borne <strong>of</strong> experience - can be<br />

equated with the Annaliste longue durée and/or social time (the division between which<br />

Bradley sees as being blurred at the edges, 1991, p.210), and events which belongs to<br />

individual time. From a Heideggerian stance, this has similarities with ‘private’ or<br />

‘existentialist’ time and ‘public’ or ‘pragmatic’ time (Thomas 1996, p.44). The connection<br />

this theory has to the Annales tradition is its ability to allow a systemic way <strong>of</strong> looking at<br />

things to take place, connected to the large scale, but that also allow a consideration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

small-scale events and actions.<br />

Both Giddens and scholars associated with the Annales School, see human existence as<br />

operating at different levels and are concerned with the interrelationship <strong>of</strong> these levels.<br />

However, the Annales School although recognizes cognition, the role <strong>of</strong> agency in the<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> structure, which in turn affects how people act, as Giddens explains it, is absent.<br />

Instead, Annales historians, and in particular Febvre, (1928; 1942, see Bintliff, 1993, p.5)<br />

consider cognition, not on an individual basis at all, but as a mentalité, referring largely to the<br />

psychology <strong>of</strong> an epoch. There are aspects <strong>of</strong> this with which I agree, particularly the strong<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!