02.03.2013 Views

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e <strong>of</strong> little relevance or use at all, but if we did not employ them, we would never know this<br />

data or have the opportunity to investigate different possibilities.<br />

As argued in Chapter 7, the way forward in archaeology has to be a more explicit<br />

acknowledgement that an interpretation is only one <strong>of</strong> many possible other ways <strong>of</strong> explaining<br />

the same evidence, that there are no absolutes, even with the use <strong>of</strong> all the best high-tech<br />

instruments in the world. Archaeology is all about possibilities and probabilities and the ideas<br />

we have about these. Assumptions must be made if one is to get anywhere at all, but it is<br />

necessary for these assumptions to be made explicit, and by becoming aware <strong>of</strong> them<br />

ourselves, we are able to question their validity. It is in this light that a GIS should be used.<br />

By and in itself, the use <strong>of</strong> one will not give the answers – it provides a framework in which<br />

ideas such as those relating to perception, experience and dwelling within a landscape can be<br />

explored in one way. The danger is that information technology, in this case, GIS or VR,<br />

gives the illusion <strong>of</strong> being authoritative and right, when it should be recognised and used as a<br />

tool and a platform in which ideas can be explored and illustrated.<br />

In the end, in a study such as this that is concerned with the physical nature <strong>of</strong> the world in<br />

which people lived in the past and how that acted upon them, their perceptions and the way<br />

they lived, nothing can take the place <strong>of</strong> actually being there, visiting the sites in person and<br />

very unscientifically soaking up the atmosphere. Exon et al (2000, p.105), describe how they<br />

developed the concept <strong>of</strong> a “quality view” through their fieldwork, which referred to views<br />

and vistas that were visually ‘more stunning’ than others, from which a gut reaction was felt<br />

when the view was revealed. Quality views could not be picked up by computer-generated<br />

viewsheds, but involved elements <strong>of</strong> the landscape that could only be recognised by a person,<br />

being there. A GIS Digital Elevation Model in the present study, given the constraints <strong>of</strong> time<br />

and money would have been little more than a very time consuming and expensive way <strong>of</strong><br />

308

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!