02.03.2013 Views

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

people who were not directly involved to watch from a distance. Those organising and taking<br />

part in proceedings probably had very little control about who could do this and perhaps had<br />

very little desire to exert any either. In addition, although there is a stream relatively close to<br />

the site, it is not prominent, and the association with water is not apparent, as it had been in<br />

the LBA. Again, the openness <strong>of</strong> the landscape may have facilitated the importance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sky, its expanse very evident as one moves from place to place on the plain. Rather than<br />

water as the transporter <strong>of</strong> the soul, it may have been the air, enhancing the ethereal quality <strong>of</strong><br />

the spirit <strong>of</strong> the deceased (cf. Goodison 1989, p.179).<br />

The only contemporary literary evidence that we have for attitudes towards their dead <strong>of</strong> those<br />

living in the 8th century is Homer. Sourvinou-Inwood (1995, p.116), after full consideration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the context in which the Homeric stories were transmitted and told, argues that at this<br />

period there is an apparent belief in the dead as retaining reason and wisdom as opposed to the<br />

earlier belief in the witless dead. The change from multiple to single burials may go some<br />

way to support this. If the spirit retained its sense, it would not be wise to interfere with its<br />

remains with which it may have kept a connection. Multiple burials by their very nature were<br />

revisited to deposit more remains, <strong>of</strong>ten with the earlier burials being disturbed as at many<br />

LBA chamber and tholos tombs. There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> multiple burials in the graves <strong>of</strong> this<br />

site, despite the fact that there are cases <strong>of</strong> two or more in ‘simple’ grave types <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Mycenaean period (Lewartowski 1995, p.104). However, even if the burials possessed single<br />

interments, revisiting the graves was not prohibited. Presumably, they were also marked out<br />

in some way, perhaps by a small mound <strong>of</strong> stones or earth: the pithoi reported by Hodkinson<br />

& Hodkinson (1981, p.148) had evidence <strong>of</strong> a covering <strong>of</strong> stones as grave markers.<br />

Whatever the grave marker, the fact that the dead were buried in a specific place meant that<br />

they still had a material presence and occupied a location in space. When that space was<br />

203

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!