02.03.2013 Views

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

There has been much anthropological and ethnographic work undertaken on the position <strong>of</strong><br />

sacred places, with evidence from across the world showing broad similarities.<br />

Archaeological evidence also indicates that types <strong>of</strong> places chosen as sacred sites incline<br />

towards particular locations, suggesting that such decisions are neither historically nor<br />

culturally significant but indicative <strong>of</strong> a general human inclination (Carmichael et al. 1994,<br />

p.1). These are sites <strong>of</strong> natural features and include mountain peaks, springs, rivers, woods,<br />

and caves, all features significant in many sites <strong>of</strong> religious significance in Arkadia. For<br />

example, Asea-Ayios Elias is situated on a mountain peak (Forsen 1999), the Temple <strong>of</strong><br />

Athena Alea at Tegea is located by a spring (Østby 1994, p.46), Psophis-Ayios Petros is<br />

located in a high place and close to a spring (Karadara 1988), and the possible shrine <strong>of</strong><br />

Hermes on Mount Kyllene is situated in a cave (Tausend 1999). It is largely due to these<br />

factors that it was felt worthwhile to investigate further sites such as Vlakherna-Petra (case<br />

study B).<br />

This is not to say that all sacred places belong in such locations. The necessity <strong>of</strong> proximity<br />

to population for religious places means that not all sacred places are located according to<br />

natural features. Modern experience shows that this is not the case, although the gross<br />

urbanisation so characteristic <strong>of</strong> modern society, both West and East, is peculiar to our times,<br />

masking the ‘natural’ landscapes. However, although there are undoubtedly aspects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

settings <strong>of</strong> modern religious buildings/spaces that are peculiarly modern, it is also true that<br />

urbanisation and concentration <strong>of</strong> populations in one place in ancient contexts would have<br />

increased the need for intra-urban sanctuaries, located for reasons other than natural features.<br />

Nonetheless, the setting would still inform religious practice and sentiment as people used and<br />

moved throughout the space. It has also been suggested that those settlements, which did not<br />

develop an intra-urban temple, were short-lived (Snodgrass 1977; Mazarakis Ainian 1997).<br />

On the other hand, many modern societies also have religious buildings located on sites <strong>of</strong><br />

122

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!