02.03.2013 Views

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Given the constraints <strong>of</strong> this study, only a number <strong>of</strong> the sites were investigated thoroughly in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> a phenomenological inspired approach and this was on sites that had been visited<br />

more than once. Such an approach requires an amount <strong>of</strong> familiarity with the landscape and<br />

given the detail and attention required for such an approach to be meaningful, it is impossible<br />

for everything to be considered in a single visit. Additional aspects came to mind on<br />

subsequent visits. In terms developed from the work <strong>of</strong> Gibson and Ingold, the landscape had<br />

different ‘affordances’ each time a site was visited. In order to record these experiences, tapes<br />

<strong>of</strong> conversations were made at a number <strong>of</strong> sites. In addition, panoramic photographs, and<br />

video clips help to illustrate the location and features in the landscape in a way that a GIS<br />

could not (see Appendix 1). The thought process started with a systematized description <strong>of</strong><br />

the surroundings, which ensured as far as possible that as many aspects <strong>of</strong> the landscape could<br />

be brought to mind and not just those that were most striking at first, although <strong>of</strong> course these<br />

experiences were not ignored. In a way, this was an attempt to control the affordances <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environment by consciously trying to bring them forth. This consideration <strong>of</strong> the landscape<br />

did not stop once the field visits were over. For example daily driving around the region <strong>of</strong><br />

Levidi, where I was based for most <strong>of</strong> the field visits, meant a particular familiarity with the<br />

area around Mantinea and Orchomenos, which is why the sites in these plains figure<br />

particularly prominently in the case studies in Part Two. It also served well to visit the area at<br />

different times <strong>of</strong> the year, which occurred more by accident than by design. Three field<br />

visits in total were undertaken, the first two <strong>of</strong> approximately six weeks duration (late April –<br />

early June, 2001; October-November 2003) and the third, twelve days (May 2005) covering<br />

the late spring, early summer, late summer and autumn. This enabled an appreciation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

variability <strong>of</strong> the weather in Arkadia even in summer, when thunderstorms are frequent. In<br />

addition, the weather and temperature can change quickly, especially at the end <strong>of</strong> summer<br />

and during the autumn. This allowed the effect <strong>of</strong> weather on visibility to be experienced at<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!