02.03.2013 Views

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

affected relations between participants on Ayios Elias and those who lived on the edge <strong>of</strong>, or<br />

on, the Megalopolis plain, although at present there is no evidence from the plain itself and<br />

very little from the edge datable to the period in question (Roy et al. 1992). In part, these<br />

people may not have been aware <strong>of</strong> any activity if it was not seen and thus not affected, as<br />

those to the east would have been had they seen and been refused access. On the other hand,<br />

those to the west may have heard from others, thus aware <strong>of</strong> their exclusion, not knowing<br />

through any visible means when such activity was taking place, maybe only hearing after the<br />

event. This may have been an unintended consequence <strong>of</strong> positioning the altar where it was,<br />

but one that was real and would have affected the lives <strong>of</strong> those living to the west <strong>of</strong> the hill<br />

and those living in the valley and using the hill. Once on the hill, the group <strong>of</strong> participants<br />

performing rituals, although they would have their view <strong>of</strong> the east obscured by smoke and<br />

the altar would have been facing in this direction with their attention on the sacrifices, their<br />

backs turned physically towards the west (Fig.4.24 & 4.25).<br />

Of course, these are things about which we can only conjecture, although the existence <strong>of</strong><br />

Lakonian PG may suggest that people from over the Tsemborou range, could have joined in<br />

with activities. This inclusion or exclusion could have changed quite frequently, depending<br />

on relations that were sustained or broken with groups in contact with one another from<br />

neighbouring valleys or further afield. Forsen (1999, p.186) argues that this site, from the<br />

beginning, was the focal point <strong>of</strong> several communities in the southern Mainalon district <strong>of</strong><br />

Arkadia and continued as such when poleis in the region were developing. This is in contrast<br />

to an earlier suggestion that the sanctuary was extra-urban in nature, delimiting the territory <strong>of</strong><br />

the polis <strong>of</strong> Asea or according to Jost (1985, p.200) the territory <strong>of</strong> Peraitheis to the north<br />

(Fig.4.26).<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!