23.03.2013 Views

Briana Anderson - Cornell University

Briana Anderson - Cornell University

Briana Anderson - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13<br />

In a related study, Lafferty and Goldsmith (1999) examined the effects of<br />

endorser and corporate credibility on consumers’ attitude toward the brand, attitude<br />

toward the ad, and purchase intentions. A 2 X 2 experiment (high versus low<br />

corporate credibility and high versus low endorser credibility) between subjects design<br />

was used. One hundred female students were shown 4 fictitious magazine<br />

advertisements and were asked to evaluate the credibility of the endorser using<br />

Ohanian’s (1990) endorser credibility scale and Newell’s’ (1993) corporate credibility<br />

scale. Additionally, participants indicated their attitudes toward the brand and<br />

advertisements as well as purchase intentions. The results of their experiment<br />

indicated that both types of credibility influence attitude toward the ad and the brand,<br />

but that corporate credibility alone has a significant influence on purchase intentions.<br />

Additionally, endorser credibility has a greater influence on attitude toward the ad<br />

while corporate credibility has a greater influence on attitude toward the brand and<br />

purchase intentions indicating that people look more to the endorser credibility for<br />

judgments about the ad and corporate credibility for judgments about the brand. In<br />

this study, the effects of endorser and corporate credibility were independent and did<br />

not interact.<br />

Finally, Lafferty et al. (2002) propose a theory of the combined influence of<br />

corporate and endorser credibility, shown in Figure 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!