23.03.2013 Views

Briana Anderson - Cornell University

Briana Anderson - Cornell University

Briana Anderson - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

51<br />

illustrates that the findings are similar for a univariate ANOVA model with endorser<br />

trustworthiness as the dependent variable as the summed endorser credibility variable.<br />

That is, attractiveness has significance in the model. The relationship is negative<br />

between attractiveness and perceptions of endorser trustworthiness.<br />

Table 21<br />

Univariate Analysis table for Dependent Variable Endorser Trustworthiness<br />

Source Type III<br />

Sum of<br />

Squares<br />

Degrees<br />

of<br />

Freedom<br />

Mean<br />

Square<br />

F Sig.<br />

Corrected Model 1654.091 5 330.818 5.525 .000<br />

Intercept 43148.499 1 43148.499 720.618 .000<br />

Gender 14.344 1 14.344 .240 .625<br />

Class 358.333 1 358.333 5.984 .015<br />

Attractiveness 1186.193 1 1186.193 19.810 .000<br />

Company Type 77.859 1 77.859 1.300 .255<br />

Attractiveness * 20.318 1 20.318 .339 .561<br />

Company Type<br />

Error 15927.308 266 59.877<br />

Total 298627.063 272<br />

Corrected Total 17581.399 271<br />

R Squared = .094 (Adjusted R Squared = .077)<br />

Table 22 presents the mean endorser trustworthiness with the fixed factor<br />

endorser trustworthiness, which illustrates that for endorser trustworthiness, the means<br />

were very similar for the endorsers regardless of company type, but were different in<br />

the attractive versus unattractive condition.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!