23.03.2013 Views

Briana Anderson - Cornell University

Briana Anderson - Cornell University

Briana Anderson - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

21<br />

• H1b: Based on the same set of research, attractiveness should have a<br />

positive relationship with endorser trustworthiness.<br />

• H1c: Based on the same set of research, attractiveness should have a<br />

positive relationship with endorser expertise.<br />

H2: Based on the Match-Up Effect, there should be an interaction between<br />

attractiveness and company type with endorser credibility. Specifically, the<br />

combination of an attractive endorser and beauty company should get a significantly<br />

higher rating of credibility than the combination of attractive endorser and the<br />

pharmaceutical company.<br />

H3: In a high involvement condition, people will rely less on the physical appearance<br />

of endorser when making judgments about organizational credibility than in a low<br />

involvement condition. (Note: Involvement refers to the amount of personal<br />

cognitive importance related to the topic of social responsibility, i.e. breast cancer).<br />

The differences between the judgments of endorser credibility (i.e. judgments based<br />

on the attractiveness of endorser) will be greater in the low involvement condition.<br />

Thus, higher levels of personal involvement will result in a smaller difference in<br />

means of endorser credibility between attractive and unattractive endorsers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!