Briana Anderson - Cornell University
Briana Anderson - Cornell University
Briana Anderson - Cornell University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER FOUR<br />
METHOD<br />
This study used a 2 X 2 X 2 experimental design with three conditions:<br />
attractiveness of endorser, company type (cosmetics vs. pharmaceutical), and the<br />
order/combination of endorser type and company type. The outcome variables are<br />
endorser credibility and organizational credibility. A total of 137 students from three<br />
communication classes participated in the study, completing a three-part questionnaire<br />
that included two CSR advertisements. The first part of the questionnaire included<br />
questions related to the participants’ perceptions of corporate credibility based on<br />
Grunig and Hon’s (1999) “Guidelines for Measuring Relationships in Public<br />
Relations”. The second section of the questionnaire required the participants to view<br />
the CSR ad again and rate the credibility of the endorser based on Ohanian’s (1990)<br />
endorser credibility scale. In the final section of the questionnaire, participants<br />
answered questions related to their cognitive involvement with breast cancer research.<br />
Data from this section of the questionnaire serve to measure the level of involvement<br />
of participants related to the social responsibility issue/ topic, i.e. breast cancer<br />
research, which the companies are involved in.<br />
Stimulus Materials<br />
The stimulus materials included two fictitious company advertisements. The<br />
focus was on testing the prototype of a CSR message to lessen the chance of<br />
participants being influenced by pre-existing attitudes toward a real company;<br />
therefore, fictitious companies were created to be the organizations in the ads. Two<br />
different companies were used (to control for company type influencing perceptions of<br />
22