23.03.2013 Views

Briana Anderson - Cornell University

Briana Anderson - Cornell University

Briana Anderson - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 2<br />

Survey Versions<br />

Version 1st endorser 1st company 2nd endorser 2nd company<br />

1 Attractive 1 azure Unattractive 1 pharmco<br />

25<br />

2 Unattractive 1 pharmco Attractive 1 azure<br />

3 Unattractive 2 azure Attractive 2 pharmco<br />

4 Attractive 2 pharmco Unattractive 2 azure<br />

5 Unattractive 1 azure Attractive 1 pharmco<br />

6 Attractive 1 pharmco Unattractive 1 azure<br />

7 Attractive 2 azure Unattractive 2 pharmco<br />

8 Unattractive 2 pharmco Attractive 2 azure<br />

Independent Variable: Attractiveness of the Endorser<br />

Physical attractiveness was measured in terms of facial attractiveness.<br />

Headshots of females were used in an effort to reduce confounding factors such as<br />

body language. Photos were obtained from on-line sources such as websites for<br />

professional executive portraits.<br />

Attractiveness and Believability Pretest<br />

The ‘truth of consensus’ approach is a method to determine attractiveness<br />

levels as high, normal, or low (Patzer, 1983). Research has demonstrated that<br />

regardless of individual preference, a high degree of agreement exists between judges<br />

in determining a person’s level of attractiveness. A method termed ‘truth of<br />

consensus’ is used to determine physical attractiveness in research settings in which a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!