03.04.2013 Views

Australian Tales - Setis

Australian Tales - Setis

Australian Tales - Setis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

contemplated taking away her father's customers, as well as his daughter,<br />

for he believed the maxim “Better is a portion in a wife, than with a wife;<br />

and he who marries for wealth sells his liberty;” but as it is not<br />

uncommon for mercenary motives to influence the minds of young wifeseckers,<br />

in other grades of society, it is just possible that Jonathan may<br />

have encouraged such greedy speculations; though I must, in justice, say,<br />

I think the humbler class of mankind are seldom chargeable with<br />

meanness of that sort. His castle-building was, however, usually brought<br />

to a dead stand — by the puzzling question, how was he to woo and win<br />

the fair object of his daily thoughts and nightly dreams, who was almost<br />

as shy as himself? He had worn out two new magnum bonum pens in his<br />

efforts to compose a love letter, but had never got beyond the first fond<br />

sentence, “my dear Feeby;” there his pen stuck fast, like a cart in a boghole,<br />

and all his ideas were as powerless to help it out as a dead horse.<br />

Had he only been scholar enough to add but those two sentences, “I love<br />

you! Will you have me for your husband?” his doubts and suspense<br />

might have soon given place to the realisation of his tenderest wishes; for<br />

Phoebe understood plain English.<br />

I have heard of a similar laconic love letter being sent to a young<br />

Cornish lass by a love sick shepherd in the far bush, who sadly wanted a<br />

wife to comfort him, as many honest bushmen do at this present time.<br />

The girl was delighted with the straightforward declaration “I love you!”<br />

and was anxious to reply to the plainly put question, “Will you have me<br />

for your husband?” in the affirmative; but how to do it she scarcely<br />

knew, for unfortunately she could not write, and she was unwilling to<br />

entrust her secret to a hired scribe; so after some consideration, she had<br />

recourse to a symbolic correspondence. Having procured an eye from a<br />

sheep's head, she carefully cleansed it, and wrapping it in a lock of wool,<br />

sent it to her admirer, who of course rightly interpreted it to signify eyewool,<br />

or I will. That was enough for him, it was an unmistakable assent<br />

to his proposition, and the consummation of his happiness soon followed.<br />

I have seen many lengthy and highly elaborated love letters, which did<br />

not contain so much honest meaning as the comical correspondence of<br />

the shepherd and the Cornish lass: and I may add, for the edification of<br />

puzzled lovers like Jonathan, that a frank, common sense avowal of their<br />

feelings and wishes is all that is necessary in such circumstances.<br />

Had Jonathan added those two important sentences to “my dear<br />

Feeby,” although it is not probable that Phoebe would have had recourse<br />

to sheep's eyes and fleece, for she could write tolerably well, her reply<br />

would doubtless have been the same in effect, “I will,” and Jonathan<br />

would have been a rejoicing man at once. But the ideas never entered<br />

into his round head, so how could he get them out of it? Though he was a<br />

little man he had a big heart, and as it expanded with the increasing force<br />

of his pent-up passion, he felt, to use his own expressive words, as if he

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!