15.04.2013 Views

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

118 Macroscopic Dynamics<br />

condensate <strong>in</strong> a lattice. Note that group velocity <strong>and</strong> superfluid velocity are related to the<br />

superfluid current I by the relations I = n¯v <strong>and</strong> I = nsvM respectively, where n is the total<br />

density <strong>and</strong> ns is the superfluid density. The decrease of the superfluid current I due to the<br />

lattice br<strong>in</strong>gs about a decrease of the group velocity <strong>and</strong> of the superfluid density rather than<br />

of the superfluid velocity. It is this effect which underlies the difference between the expression<br />

(9.7) <strong>and</strong> the group velocity.<br />

We can also def<strong>in</strong>e a macroscopic phase SM through the relation<br />

vM(r⊥,z)= ¯h<br />

m ∇SM(r⊥,z) (9.10)<br />

This fixes the quantity SM up to an irrelevant constant.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>troduction of the quantities nM <strong>and</strong> SM allows us to speak of an effective macroscopic<br />

order parameter<br />

whose evolution <strong>in</strong> time we are <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong>.<br />

ΨM = √ nM e iSM , (9.11)<br />

9.2 Hydrodynamic equations for small currents<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g the notions of macroscopic density <strong>and</strong> macroscopic superfluid velocity we devise a<br />

hydrodynamic formalism which is valid to the dynamics <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g only small currents. This<br />

restriction signifies that only small quasimomenta ¯hk are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the dynamics which are<br />

associated with currents nM¯hk/2m ∗ . The generalization to large currents is done <strong>in</strong> the<br />

subsequent section.<br />

Macroscopic energy functional<br />

The energy change per particle due to the presence of a small constant current <strong>in</strong> z-direction<br />

is ¯h 2 k2 /2m∗ = m2v2 Mz /2m∗ , where we have used the expression (9.9) for the macroscopic<br />

superfluid velocity. Us<strong>in</strong>g this fact, the total energy of the system can be written <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

the macroscopic density nM <strong>and</strong> superfluid velocity field vM<br />

<br />

E =<br />

<br />

m<br />

dr<br />

2 nMv 2 Mx + m<br />

2 nMv 2 My + m<br />

2<br />

m<br />

m∗ (nM) nMv 2 <br />

Mz + nMε(nM)+nMVext , (9.12)<br />

for the total energy of the system. Here, Vext is an external potential supposed to vary on<br />

length scales much larger than D <strong>and</strong> ε(nM) <strong>and</strong> m ∗ (nM) are, respectively, the groundstate<br />

energy <strong>and</strong> the effective mass calculated at the average density nM <strong>in</strong> absence of the external<br />

potential (see sections 5.1 <strong>and</strong> 6.1). We can rewrite the <strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>and</strong> of (9.12) <strong>in</strong> terms of the<br />

density nM <strong>and</strong> the phase SM def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> (9.10). This yields<br />

<br />

E = dr<br />

nM<br />

¯h 2 2 ∂SM<br />

+ nM<br />

2m ∂x<br />

¯h 2 2 ∂SM<br />

2m ∂y<br />

+ m<br />

nM<br />

m∗ ¯h 2 <br />

2<br />

∂SM<br />

+ nMε(nM)+nMVext .<br />

2m ∂z<br />

(9.13)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!