Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
78 Stationary states of a <strong>BEC</strong> <strong>in</strong> an optical lattice<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to the explicit dependence of the tunnel<strong>in</strong>g parameter on gn <strong>in</strong> (6.31) <strong>and</strong> secondly<br />
to the dependence of the Wannier function f on the density. In Fig. 6.9 one can see that the<br />
deviation of m∗ (gn) from the s<strong>in</strong>gle particle effective mass is approximately proportional to<br />
gn. The departure from this l<strong>in</strong>ear law <strong>in</strong> gn is due to the density dependence of the Wannier<br />
function f. For the considered <strong>in</strong>teraction gn =0.5ER it has a small effect of about 5% on<br />
the effective mass, to be compared with the 30% shift due to the explicit dependence on gn.<br />
The generalized k-dependent effective mass (6.22) takes the form<br />
1<br />
m ∗ j (k) = d2 δj<br />
¯h<br />
2 cos(kd) . (6.42)<br />
In Figs. 6.10 <strong>and</strong> 6.11 we compare the tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g expressions for the lowest energy b<strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> the associated group velocity with the respective numerical solution. To evaluate (6.29)<br />
<strong>and</strong> (6.39), the tunnel<strong>in</strong>g parameter (6.31) is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong>sert<strong>in</strong>g the numerical results for<br />
m ∗ <strong>in</strong> Eq.(6.41). We f<strong>in</strong>d that the tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g results provide a good description already at<br />
s =10for gn =0.5ER. To obta<strong>in</strong> the same degree of agreement at a higher value of gn/ER<br />
one has to go to larger s.<br />
ε/ER<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.05<br />
0<br />
−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />
0.2<br />
0.15<br />
0.1<br />
a)<br />
b)<br />
c)<br />
0<br />
−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />
¯hk/qB<br />
Figure 6.10: Comparison of the tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g expression (6.29) for the lowest energy b<strong>and</strong> with<br />
the respective numerical solution for gn =0.5ER at a) s =1,b)s =5<strong>and</strong> c) s =10.