15.04.2013 Views

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

78 Stationary states of a <strong>BEC</strong> <strong>in</strong> an optical lattice<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to the explicit dependence of the tunnel<strong>in</strong>g parameter on gn <strong>in</strong> (6.31) <strong>and</strong> secondly<br />

to the dependence of the Wannier function f on the density. In Fig. 6.9 one can see that the<br />

deviation of m∗ (gn) from the s<strong>in</strong>gle particle effective mass is approximately proportional to<br />

gn. The departure from this l<strong>in</strong>ear law <strong>in</strong> gn is due to the density dependence of the Wannier<br />

function f. For the considered <strong>in</strong>teraction gn =0.5ER it has a small effect of about 5% on<br />

the effective mass, to be compared with the 30% shift due to the explicit dependence on gn.<br />

The generalized k-dependent effective mass (6.22) takes the form<br />

1<br />

m ∗ j (k) = d2 δj<br />

¯h<br />

2 cos(kd) . (6.42)<br />

In Figs. 6.10 <strong>and</strong> 6.11 we compare the tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g expressions for the lowest energy b<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> the associated group velocity with the respective numerical solution. To evaluate (6.29)<br />

<strong>and</strong> (6.39), the tunnel<strong>in</strong>g parameter (6.31) is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong>sert<strong>in</strong>g the numerical results for<br />

m ∗ <strong>in</strong> Eq.(6.41). We f<strong>in</strong>d that the tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g results provide a good description already at<br />

s =10for gn =0.5ER. To obta<strong>in</strong> the same degree of agreement at a higher value of gn/ER<br />

one has to go to larger s.<br />

ε/ER<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.05<br />

0<br />

−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />

0.2<br />

0.15<br />

0.1<br />

a)<br />

b)<br />

c)<br />

0<br />

−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />

¯hk/qB<br />

Figure 6.10: Comparison of the tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g expression (6.29) for the lowest energy b<strong>and</strong> with<br />

the respective numerical solution for gn =0.5ER at a) s =1,b)s =5<strong>and</strong> c) s =10.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!