Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
9.2 Hydrodynamic equations for small currents 119<br />
Even though this expression is written <strong>in</strong> terms of macroscopic variables, the energy change<br />
brought about by the lattice is implicitly accounted for by the effective mass m ∗ (nM) <strong>and</strong><br />
by the function ε(nM), which have been calculated microscopically solv<strong>in</strong>g the stationary<br />
GP-equation <strong>in</strong> presence of the optical lattice.<br />
Action pr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />
Our derivation of the equations of motion for the macroscopic density nM <strong>and</strong> the macroscopic<br />
velocity field vM is based on the requirement that the action<br />
t ′ <br />
∂<br />
A = dt E − i¯h<br />
(9.14)<br />
0<br />
∂t<br />
is stationary <strong>and</strong> hence satisfies the condition<br />
δA =0. (9.15)<br />
The <strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> (9.14) conta<strong>in</strong>s the quantity<br />
<br />
∂<br />
= dr Ψ<br />
∂t<br />
∗ ∂<br />
M<br />
∂t ΨM<br />
<br />
<br />
1 ∂<br />
= dr<br />
2 ∂t nM<br />
∂<br />
+ <strong>in</strong>M<br />
∂t SM<br />
<br />
. (9.16)<br />
ThefirsttermdoesnotcontributetoδA s<strong>in</strong>ce the variation at t =0<strong>and</strong> t = t ′ is zero by<br />
assumption.<br />
Impos<strong>in</strong>g (9.15) on the variation of the action with respect to SM <strong>and</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g (9.10) for<br />
the relation between SM <strong>and</strong> the macroscopic superfluid velocity, we f<strong>in</strong>d the equation of<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uity<br />
∂<br />
∂t nM<br />
<br />
m<br />
+ ∂x(vMxnM)+∂y(vMynM)+∂z vMznM =0. (9.17)<br />
m∗ On the other h<strong>and</strong>, upon variation of the action with respect to nM <strong>and</strong> impos<strong>in</strong>g (9.15), we<br />
obta<strong>in</strong> an Euler equation for the macroscopic density<br />
m ∂<br />
∂t vM<br />
<br />
+ ∇ Vext + µopt(nM)+ m<br />
2 v2 Mx + m<br />
2 v2 My + ∂<br />
∂nM<br />
where µopt(nM) =∂ [nMε(nM)] /∂nM denotes the groundstate chemical potential for Vext =<br />
0 (see Eq.(5.9)).<br />
It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that <strong>in</strong> (9.17), the current <strong>in</strong> the lattice direction is modified by the<br />
factor m/m∗ . S<strong>in</strong>ce the respective current component can be written as the product of the<br />
superfluid velocity component <strong>and</strong> the superfluid density<br />
the superfluid density results to be<br />
<br />
m m<br />
nM<br />
m∗ 2 v2 <br />
Mz =0, (9.18)<br />
I = nsvMz , (9.19)<br />
ns = nM<br />
m<br />
. (9.20)<br />
m∗