15.04.2013 Views

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9.2 Hydrodynamic equations for small currents 119<br />

Even though this expression is written <strong>in</strong> terms of macroscopic variables, the energy change<br />

brought about by the lattice is implicitly accounted for by the effective mass m ∗ (nM) <strong>and</strong><br />

by the function ε(nM), which have been calculated microscopically solv<strong>in</strong>g the stationary<br />

GP-equation <strong>in</strong> presence of the optical lattice.<br />

Action pr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />

Our derivation of the equations of motion for the macroscopic density nM <strong>and</strong> the macroscopic<br />

velocity field vM is based on the requirement that the action<br />

t ′ <br />

∂<br />

A = dt E − i¯h<br />

(9.14)<br />

0<br />

∂t<br />

is stationary <strong>and</strong> hence satisfies the condition<br />

δA =0. (9.15)<br />

The <strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> (9.14) conta<strong>in</strong>s the quantity<br />

<br />

∂<br />

= dr Ψ<br />

∂t<br />

∗ ∂<br />

M<br />

∂t ΨM<br />

<br />

<br />

1 ∂<br />

= dr<br />

2 ∂t nM<br />

∂<br />

+ <strong>in</strong>M<br />

∂t SM<br />

<br />

. (9.16)<br />

ThefirsttermdoesnotcontributetoδA s<strong>in</strong>ce the variation at t =0<strong>and</strong> t = t ′ is zero by<br />

assumption.<br />

Impos<strong>in</strong>g (9.15) on the variation of the action with respect to SM <strong>and</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g (9.10) for<br />

the relation between SM <strong>and</strong> the macroscopic superfluid velocity, we f<strong>in</strong>d the equation of<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uity<br />

∂<br />

∂t nM<br />

<br />

m<br />

+ ∂x(vMxnM)+∂y(vMynM)+∂z vMznM =0. (9.17)<br />

m∗ On the other h<strong>and</strong>, upon variation of the action with respect to nM <strong>and</strong> impos<strong>in</strong>g (9.15), we<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> an Euler equation for the macroscopic density<br />

m ∂<br />

∂t vM<br />

<br />

+ ∇ Vext + µopt(nM)+ m<br />

2 v2 Mx + m<br />

2 v2 My + ∂<br />

∂nM<br />

where µopt(nM) =∂ [nMε(nM)] /∂nM denotes the groundstate chemical potential for Vext =<br />

0 (see Eq.(5.9)).<br />

It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that <strong>in</strong> (9.17), the current <strong>in</strong> the lattice direction is modified by the<br />

factor m/m∗ . S<strong>in</strong>ce the respective current component can be written as the product of the<br />

superfluid velocity component <strong>and</strong> the superfluid density<br />

the superfluid density results to be<br />

<br />

m m<br />

nM<br />

m∗ 2 v2 <br />

Mz =0, (9.18)<br />

I = nsvMz , (9.19)<br />

ns = nM<br />

m<br />

. (9.20)<br />

m∗

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!