Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
94 Bogoliubov excitations of Bloch state condensates<br />
As <strong>in</strong> the previous chapter 6.2, we have neglected next-neighbour terms of the k<strong>in</strong>d dzf 2 l f 2 l±1<br />
<strong>and</strong> we have used the def<strong>in</strong>itions of the tunnel<strong>in</strong>g parameters δ <strong>and</strong> δµ (see Eqs.(6.31,6.34)).<br />
Eqs.(7.27,7.28) become<br />
with<br />
<br />
¯hω(q) = 2δ s<strong>in</strong>2 (Uq − Vq)2δ s<strong>in</strong> 2<br />
<br />
qd<br />
=¯hω(q)(Uq + Vq) , (7.35)<br />
2<br />
<br />
qd<br />
2(2δµ − δ)s<strong>in</strong><br />
2<br />
2 ( qd<br />
2 )+2dgn<br />
<br />
dzf 4 <br />
(z)+4(δ− δµ)<br />
(7.36)<br />
Comparison of the tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g expression for the compressibility (6.43) with δ − δµ (6.36)<br />
<strong>and</strong> n∂δ/∂n (6.38) allows us to rewrite (7.36) <strong>in</strong> the form<br />
¯hω(q) =<br />
<br />
2δ s<strong>in</strong> 2<br />
<br />
qd<br />
2<br />
2<br />
δ +2n ∂δ<br />
∂n<br />
<br />
s<strong>in</strong> 2<br />
The density dependence of this spectrum shows up <strong>in</strong> three different ways:<br />
<br />
qd<br />
+2κ<br />
2<br />
−1<br />
<br />
. (7.37)<br />
• <strong>in</strong> the density dependence of δ discussed <strong>in</strong> section 6.2 <strong>and</strong> shown <strong>in</strong> Fig.6.8 (where the<br />
quantity m ∗ ∝ 1/δ (see relation (6.41)) is plotted);<br />
• <strong>in</strong> the density dependence of κ −1 which <strong>in</strong> the tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g regime can be usually<br />
approximated by the l<strong>in</strong>ear law ˜gn (see Fig.5.5);<br />
• a contribution due to the density derivative of δ appears. However its effect <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Bogoliubov b<strong>and</strong> (7.37) is always small: for small <strong>in</strong>teractions one has n∂δ/∂n ≪ δ;<br />
<strong>in</strong>stead, for larger <strong>in</strong>teractions the <strong>in</strong>verse compressibility κ −1 dom<strong>in</strong>ates both δ <strong>and</strong><br />
n∂δ/∂n. Hence, we rewrite (7.37) neglect<strong>in</strong>g this term<br />
¯hω(q) =<br />
<br />
2δ s<strong>in</strong> 2<br />
<br />
qd<br />
2δ s<strong>in</strong><br />
2<br />
2<br />
<br />
qd<br />
+2κ<br />
2<br />
−1<br />
<br />
(7.38)<br />
Note that, as is discussed below <strong>in</strong> section 7.4 <strong>and</strong> shown <strong>in</strong> [116, 118] contributions<br />
due to n∂δ/∂n can significantly affect the excitation frequency calculated on top of a<br />
mov<strong>in</strong>g condensate.<br />
Fig.7.3 compares the numerical data with the approximate expression (7.38), evaluated<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the quantity κ−1 calculated <strong>in</strong> section 5.2 <strong>and</strong> the tunnel<strong>in</strong>g parameter δ calculated <strong>in</strong><br />
section 6.1. As already found for the lowest Bloch b<strong>and</strong>, for this value of gn, the agreement<br />
with the tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g expression is already good for s =10.<br />
It is possible to identify two regimes, where the lowest Bogoliubov b<strong>and</strong> (7.38) can be<br />
described by further simplified expressions:<br />
• for very large potential depth, the spectrum is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by the compressibility term. In<br />
fact, δ → 0 while κ −1 becomes larger <strong>and</strong> larger as s <strong>in</strong>creases. Hence, for large enough