Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
11.3 Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear propagation of sound signals 147<br />
formation time, propagates with a constant speed which we “measure” <strong>and</strong> compare with the<br />
prediction obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Bogoliubov theory. Nonl<strong>in</strong>earities can lead to a deformation of the<br />
signal <strong>and</strong> modify the speed at which it propagates. Yet, as we will see below, this need not<br />
be the case <strong>in</strong> the presence of a lattice, provided that δ ≪ U/3. Moreover, nonl<strong>in</strong>ear effects<br />
lead to the formation of dephased currents <strong>in</strong> the back of the signal. In correspondence to this<br />
the signal’s amplitude saturates while it keeps propagat<strong>in</strong>g at the Bogoliubov sound velocity.<br />
Apart from the relative density, we also look at the evolution of the relative phase φ ℓ+1/2<br />
between neighbour<strong>in</strong>g wells. The quantity φ ℓ+1/2 is def<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />
φ ℓ+1/2 = Sℓ+1 − Sℓ<br />
<strong>in</strong> the case of the DNLS, while <strong>in</strong> the case of the GP-equation we def<strong>in</strong>e<br />
(11.11)<br />
φ ℓ+1/2 = S(x =(l +1)d) − S(x = ld) (11.12)<br />
Note that <strong>in</strong> a deep lattice the phase distribution with<strong>in</strong> each well is found to be flat to a<br />
good degree. An example for nl(t)/nl(t =0)<strong>and</strong> φℓ+1/2 is plotted <strong>in</strong> Fig.11.2. We call ∆n<br />
the amplitude of the sound wave packet <strong>in</strong> the relative density <strong>and</strong> ∆φ the amplitude of the<br />
wavepacket <strong>in</strong> the relative phase, as shown <strong>in</strong> Fig.11.2.<br />
Our first result is that sound signals of measurable amplitude can be observed also <strong>in</strong> deep<br />
lattices where the sound velocity is considerably lower than <strong>in</strong> the uniform system. This is<br />
illustrated <strong>in</strong> Fig. 11.3 which depicts the sound velocity obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the simulation (circles)<br />
with the respective signal amplitudes ∆n together with the Bogoliubov prediction (solid l<strong>in</strong>e).<br />
Up to s =20relatively large signal amplitudes can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed at this value of g. Note that<br />
the signal amplitudes obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the simulation at s =20, 30 correspond to their saturated<br />
values as discussed further below.<br />
1 ↔∆<br />
n<br />
0<br />
x / d<br />
↔<br />
∆φ<br />
Figure 11.2: Example for sound signals as obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the DNLS (11.8). The signals are<br />
created <strong>in</strong> the center with a relatively weak external perturbation of the form (11.1). They<br />
move outward to the left <strong>and</strong> to the right at the Bogoliubov sound velocity. Upper panel:<br />
Ratio between the density at a long time t after the perturbation <strong>and</strong> the equilibrium density.<br />
Lower panel: Phase difference between neighbour<strong>in</strong>g wells φ ℓ+1/2 as def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> (11.12). The<br />
signal amplitude <strong>in</strong> the relative density <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the relative phase is denoted by ∆n <strong>and</strong> ∆φ<br />
respectively.