Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
11.3 Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear propagation of sound signals 151<br />
2. Shock Wave Regime<br />
The peculiarity of region (2) is the formation of shock waves. In the uniform case, a wave<br />
front emits shock waves <strong>in</strong> the forward direction (see Fig.11.4). The stronger the external<br />
perturbation, the more the sound signal deforms <strong>and</strong> spreads due to the shock waves. A<br />
measurement of the position of the signal maximum or m<strong>in</strong>imum yields a velocity which<br />
deviates from the Bogoliubov prediction for the velocity of sound. To obta<strong>in</strong> the value of the<br />
sound velocity <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Fig.11.3 we have done a convolution of the signal over a few lattice<br />
sites, mimick<strong>in</strong>g the limited resolution of a detection system. In this way the signal is less<br />
distorted by the shock waves. We then determ<strong>in</strong>e the center-of-mass position of the signal<br />
as a function of time. This method allows to extract the exact sound velocity thanks to our<br />
specific excitation method. On the contrary, a similar measurement done with a bright (dark)<br />
sound signal would lead to a higher (lower) value for the sound velocity. The formation of<br />
shock waves <strong>in</strong> front of a bright sound wave packet (positive density variation) <strong>in</strong> a uniform<br />
system is predicted analytically <strong>and</strong> numerically [149]. An analytic solution describ<strong>in</strong>g shock<br />
waves <strong>in</strong> a uniform system has been found by [150]. Their formation has also been discussed<br />
<strong>in</strong> [151].<br />
In a shallow lattice, shock waves form <strong>in</strong> the front as <strong>in</strong> the uniform case. This is because<br />
the formation of a gap <strong>in</strong> the Bogoliubov spectrum does affect only a small range of quasimomenta<br />
close to qB. Hence, the mode–coupl<strong>in</strong>g among Bogoliubov excitations leads to the<br />
creation of excitations outside the phononic regime which travel at a speed larger than the<br />
sound velocity.<br />
In a deep lattice, <strong>in</strong> contrast, shock waves are formed beh<strong>in</strong>d the sound packet. (see Fig.<br />
11.7). In fact the lowest b<strong>and</strong> tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Bogoliubov dispersion law, given by (see chapter<br />
7.3)<br />
¯hωq ≈<br />
<br />
2δs<strong>in</strong> 2<br />
πq<br />
2qB<br />
<br />
2δs<strong>in</strong>2 <br />
πq<br />
+2U , (11.13)<br />
2qB<br />
has a negative curvature for all q as long as δ/U < 1/3. Iftheratioδ/U is larger than 1/3 the<br />
Bogoliubov dispersion has a positive curvature <strong>in</strong> a small range of quasimomenta <strong>and</strong> becomes<br />
negative closer to the zone boundary. Only <strong>in</strong> deep lattices (where δ/U ≪ 1/3), wavepackets<br />
composed by quasi-momenta out of the phononic regime will propagate slower than the sound<br />
packets. In this case shock wave formation takes place both <strong>in</strong> the front <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the back of the<br />
sound wavepacket. Note that for typical values of the density δ/U lies between zero <strong>and</strong> one.<br />
In a deep lattice where shock waves are formed beh<strong>in</strong>d the sound packet, we observe that the<br />
relative phase distribution can approach φ ℓ+1/2 ∼ π/2, as shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 11.8 which refers to an<br />
early stage of the evolution shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 11.7. Then, it becomes strongly deformed <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that higher orders of the s<strong>in</strong>e–function <strong>in</strong> (11.10) are important. However this behaviour does<br />
not become critical up to the po<strong>in</strong>t where the relative phase of two neighbor<strong>in</strong>g lattice sites<br />
φ ℓ+1/2 = π, which def<strong>in</strong>es the onset of regime (3).