15.04.2013 Views

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

134 Array of Josephson junctions<br />

The formalism developed <strong>in</strong> this chapter is useful <strong>in</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g the propagation of sound<br />

signals <strong>in</strong> a condensate subject to a lattice potential (see the subsequent chapter 11).<br />

In [102], we presented the dynamical equations for the occupations <strong>and</strong> phases of each<br />

site, as well as the result for the lowest Bogoliubov b<strong>and</strong>. The discussion of the Josephson<br />

Hamiltonian is added here.<br />

10.1 Current-phase dynamics <strong>in</strong> the tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g regime<br />

In section 6.1 we have discussed Bloch state solutions of the stationary GP-equation <strong>in</strong> the<br />

periodic potential of the optical lattice. We have shown that the condensate Bloch functions<br />

Ψjk(z) can be written <strong>in</strong> terms of the condensate Wannier functions fj,l(z) <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

way<br />

Ψjk(z) = √<br />

ndfj,l(z)e ikld . (10.1)<br />

l<br />

Note that Ψjk is normalized to the total number of atoms Ntot <strong>and</strong> apart from the normalization<br />

co<strong>in</strong>cides with the Bloch function ϕjk (see Eq.(5.2)). In this section we will use<br />

an ansatz similar to (10.1) for the time-dependent condensate wavefunction Ψ(z,t), allow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for the time-dependence of site occupation <strong>and</strong> phase. In the tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g regime the<br />

time-dependent phases <strong>and</strong> populations of each lattice site emerge as the dynamical variables.<br />

Let us consider a stationary Bloch state of the lowest b<strong>and</strong> (j =1) <strong>in</strong> the tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

regime. For convenience, we will choose the correspond<strong>in</strong>g Wannier functions fl to take only<br />

real values. S<strong>in</strong>ce fl is well localized at site l wecansaythatthecondensateatsitelhas phase<br />

Sl = kld − µ(k)<br />

t. (10.2)<br />

¯h<br />

The density of particles at site l is simply given by<br />

nl = n, (10.3)<br />

where, as previously, n is the average density of the system. Hence, <strong>in</strong> this state the population<br />

of each site is constant across the sample at any time t, while the phases Sl vary with the site<br />

<strong>in</strong>dex <strong>and</strong> have the simple time dependence µ(k)t/¯h. Furthermore, recall that two Wannier<br />

functions fl, fl ′ can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from each other by a simple displacement<br />

<strong>and</strong> that the set {fl} is found for a given average density n<br />

Ansatz for the time-dependent wavefunction<br />

fl(z) =fl ′(z − (l − l′ )d) (10.4)<br />

fl(z) =fl(z; n) . (10.5)<br />

We are <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> time-dependent solutions Ψ(z,t) of (3.14). We focus on states whose<br />

form is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by releas<strong>in</strong>g the restriction of the phases Sl <strong>and</strong> the average densities nl to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!