15.04.2013 Views

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

148 Sound propagation <strong>in</strong> presence of a one-dimensional optical lattice<br />

c(s)/c(s=0)<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

11%<br />

13%<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Figure 11.3: Sound velocity as a function of lattice depth s. Bogoliubov prediction (solid l<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

<strong>and</strong> results “measured” based on the simulation (circles) with respective signal amplitudes ∆n<br />

for gn =0.5ER. The signal amplitude ∆n is def<strong>in</strong>ed as <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> Fig. 11.2.<br />

In Fig. 11.4 we plot the relative density at the f<strong>in</strong>al stage of our GP-simulation for the lattice<br />

depths s =0, 10, 20 with gn =0.5ER for a large perturbation. From these simulations we<br />

extract the sound velocity <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Fig.11.3. These results show that the measured signals<br />

already <strong>in</strong>volve significant nonl<strong>in</strong>ear effects, even <strong>in</strong> the uniform case. We will now discuss <strong>in</strong><br />

more detail what nonl<strong>in</strong>ear effects can occur <strong>and</strong> how they affect the sound signal. By keep<strong>in</strong>g<br />

lattice depth <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction fixed while <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the strength of the external perturbation<br />

the role of nonl<strong>in</strong>earities <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>and</strong> we pass through three regimes:<br />

1. l<strong>in</strong>ear regime, where the Bogoliubov description holds <strong>and</strong> the variations of density <strong>and</strong><br />

relative phases are small;<br />

2. shock wave regime, where density variations <strong>in</strong>duce mode–coupl<strong>in</strong>g among Bogoliubov<br />

excitations, giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to the formation of shock waves. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the curvature<br />

of the Bogoliubov dispersion beyond the phononic regime, shock waves emerge <strong>in</strong> front<br />

of the wavepacket (uniform system, shallow lattice), both <strong>in</strong> the front <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the back<br />

(<strong>in</strong>termediate lattice depth) or only <strong>in</strong> the back (deep lattice with δ ≪ U/3). In the<br />

case <strong>in</strong> which shock waves form only <strong>in</strong> the back, the signal ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s a compact shape<br />

<strong>and</strong> propagates at the sound velocity predicted by Bogoliubov theory. In the other two<br />

cases, the sound signal deforms <strong>and</strong> disperses.<br />

3. saturation regime <strong>in</strong> a deep lattice, where there exists a non–trivial dependence of the<br />

current on the relative phase. The sound signal amplitude saturates, leaves beh<strong>in</strong>d a<br />

s<br />

5%<br />

2%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!