15.04.2013 Views

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.4 Effects of harmonic trapp<strong>in</strong>g 57<br />

With<strong>in</strong> this generalized LDA, the chemical potential at site l is given by<br />

µl = µopt(nl(r⊥)) + m<br />

2 (ω2 zl 2 d 2 + ω 2 ⊥r 2 ⊥) , (5.22)<br />

where µopt(nl(r⊥)) is the chemical potential calculated at the average density nl(r⊥) <strong>in</strong> the<br />

presence of the optical lattice potential only. The effect of axial trapp<strong>in</strong>g is accounted for<br />

by the term mω2 zl2d2 /2 s<strong>in</strong>ce the harmonic potential varies slowly on the scale d. Eq.(5.22)<br />

fixes the radial density profile nl(r⊥) at the l-th site once the value of µl or, equivalently, the<br />

number of atoms at well l<br />

Rl<br />

Nl =2πd r⊥dr⊥nl(r⊥) , (5.23)<br />

0<br />

is known. In Eq.(5.23), Rl is the radial size of the condensate at the l-th site, which is fixed<br />

by the value of r⊥ where the density nl(r⊥) vanishes.<br />

When equilibrium is established across the whole sample we have µl = µ for all l. Mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

use of this fact <strong>and</strong> employ<strong>in</strong>g that <br />

l Nl = Ntot, we can f<strong>in</strong>d the dependence of µ on the<br />

total number of particles Ntot. This procedure also yields the s<strong>in</strong>gle well occupation numbers<br />

Nl <strong>and</strong> the number of sites occupied <strong>in</strong> the groundstate.<br />

In the simple case <strong>in</strong> which the chemical potential without harmonic trap exhibits the l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

dependence on density µopt = µgn=0 +˜g(s)n (see Eq.(5.13)), one obta<strong>in</strong>s for the radial density<br />

profile<br />

nl(r⊥) = 1<br />

<br />

µ − µgn=0 −<br />

˜g<br />

m<br />

2 ω2 zl 2 d 2 − m<br />

2 ω2 ⊥r 2 <br />

⊥ . (5.24)<br />

The well occupation numbers <strong>and</strong> transverse radii are given by<br />

<br />

1 − l2<br />

2 , (5.25)<br />

where<br />

Nl = N0<br />

l2 m<br />

<br />

Rl = R0 1 − l2<br />

l2 1/2 m<br />

lm =<br />

<br />

2(µ − µgn=0)<br />

mω 2 zd 2<br />

, (5.26)<br />

is the outer most occupied site <strong>and</strong> fixes the total number 2lm +1of occupied sites, <strong>and</strong><br />

R0 =<br />

<br />

2(µ − µgn=0)<br />

mω 2 ⊥<br />

(5.27)<br />

(5.28)<br />

is the radial size at the trap center. To obta<strong>in</strong> an explicit expression for the chemical potential<br />

µ <strong>and</strong> the occupation N0 of the central site, we apply the cont<strong>in</strong>uum approximation <br />

l →<br />

1/d dz to the normalization condition <br />

l Nl = Ntot. This yields<br />

µ = ¯h¯ω<br />

2<br />

<br />

a<br />

15Ntot<br />

aho<br />

2/5 ˜g<br />

+ µgn=0<br />

g<br />

(5.29)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!