Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.4 Effects of harmonic trapp<strong>in</strong>g 57<br />
With<strong>in</strong> this generalized LDA, the chemical potential at site l is given by<br />
µl = µopt(nl(r⊥)) + m<br />
2 (ω2 zl 2 d 2 + ω 2 ⊥r 2 ⊥) , (5.22)<br />
where µopt(nl(r⊥)) is the chemical potential calculated at the average density nl(r⊥) <strong>in</strong> the<br />
presence of the optical lattice potential only. The effect of axial trapp<strong>in</strong>g is accounted for<br />
by the term mω2 zl2d2 /2 s<strong>in</strong>ce the harmonic potential varies slowly on the scale d. Eq.(5.22)<br />
fixes the radial density profile nl(r⊥) at the l-th site once the value of µl or, equivalently, the<br />
number of atoms at well l<br />
Rl<br />
Nl =2πd r⊥dr⊥nl(r⊥) , (5.23)<br />
0<br />
is known. In Eq.(5.23), Rl is the radial size of the condensate at the l-th site, which is fixed<br />
by the value of r⊥ where the density nl(r⊥) vanishes.<br />
When equilibrium is established across the whole sample we have µl = µ for all l. Mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
use of this fact <strong>and</strong> employ<strong>in</strong>g that <br />
l Nl = Ntot, we can f<strong>in</strong>d the dependence of µ on the<br />
total number of particles Ntot. This procedure also yields the s<strong>in</strong>gle well occupation numbers<br />
Nl <strong>and</strong> the number of sites occupied <strong>in</strong> the groundstate.<br />
In the simple case <strong>in</strong> which the chemical potential without harmonic trap exhibits the l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />
dependence on density µopt = µgn=0 +˜g(s)n (see Eq.(5.13)), one obta<strong>in</strong>s for the radial density<br />
profile<br />
nl(r⊥) = 1<br />
<br />
µ − µgn=0 −<br />
˜g<br />
m<br />
2 ω2 zl 2 d 2 − m<br />
2 ω2 ⊥r 2 <br />
⊥ . (5.24)<br />
The well occupation numbers <strong>and</strong> transverse radii are given by<br />
<br />
1 − l2<br />
2 , (5.25)<br />
where<br />
Nl = N0<br />
l2 m<br />
<br />
Rl = R0 1 − l2<br />
l2 1/2 m<br />
lm =<br />
<br />
2(µ − µgn=0)<br />
mω 2 zd 2<br />
, (5.26)<br />
is the outer most occupied site <strong>and</strong> fixes the total number 2lm +1of occupied sites, <strong>and</strong><br />
R0 =<br />
<br />
2(µ − µgn=0)<br />
mω 2 ⊥<br />
(5.27)<br />
(5.28)<br />
is the radial size at the trap center. To obta<strong>in</strong> an explicit expression for the chemical potential<br />
µ <strong>and</strong> the occupation N0 of the central site, we apply the cont<strong>in</strong>uum approximation <br />
l →<br />
1/d dz to the normalization condition <br />
l Nl = Ntot. This yields<br />
µ = ¯h¯ω<br />
2<br />
<br />
a<br />
15Ntot<br />
aho<br />
2/5 ˜g<br />
+ µgn=0<br />
g<br />
(5.29)