15.04.2013 Views

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10.3 Josephson Hamiltonian 141<br />

For both systems the second crucial parameter apart from EC is given by EJ = Nδgn=0<br />

sett<strong>in</strong>g an upper bound to the current that can flow through the lattice. Note that also<br />

the analogies between m, Z <strong>and</strong> Φ, kdgo along with a physical resemblance. Yet, a clear<br />

difference consists <strong>in</strong> the fact that the “charg<strong>in</strong>g energy” <strong>in</strong> the case of the center-of-mass<br />

motion is not provided by <strong>in</strong>teractions but by the external trapp<strong>in</strong>g potential. The plasma<br />

frequency ωP = √ ECEJ/¯h of the s<strong>in</strong>gle Josephson junction (10.46) corresponds to the dipole<br />

frequency ωD = π2δ/2ERωz of the harmonically conf<strong>in</strong>ed lattice <strong>in</strong> the tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g regime<br />

(see section 9.6 Eq.(9.51) <strong>and</strong> use (6.41)).<br />

Note that a double well system with a TF-condensate <strong>in</strong> each well is not well described<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the framework presented here. The Josephson Hamiltonian for such a system should<br />

<strong>in</strong>volve a density-dependent tunnel<strong>in</strong>g parameter <strong>and</strong> a compressibility which is non-l<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>in</strong><br />

the density. In fact, it is easy to see that if the condensate has a TF-profile <strong>in</strong> each well,<br />

EC =2∂µ/∂N ∼ N −3/5 <strong>in</strong>deed depends on N. Moreover, the tails of the wavefunction <strong>in</strong><br />

the region of the barrier are obta<strong>in</strong>ed by match<strong>in</strong>g the TF-profile to an exponential decay<strong>in</strong>g<br />

function. This match<strong>in</strong>g procedure makes δ sensitive to N. S<strong>in</strong>ce for a larger N the TFprofile<br />

becomes steeper at the barrier boundary, δ can <strong>in</strong> fact decrease for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g N [57], <strong>in</strong><br />

contrast to the behavior of δ discussed <strong>in</strong> section 7.3 where the wavefunction of the condensate<br />

at each site resembles the s<strong>in</strong>gle particle wavefunction.<br />

With<strong>in</strong> GP theory, the phases <strong>and</strong> occupation numbers are classical quantities. One can<br />

go beyond this description by quantiz<strong>in</strong>g the appropriate Josephson Hamiltonian, replac<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the classical dynamical variables with operators (see discussion <strong>in</strong> [1] chapter 15.6). This<br />

shows that the parameters EJ = Nδ <strong>and</strong> EC (10.34) play an important role <strong>in</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

quantum fluctuations of phases <strong>and</strong> site occupations: The <strong>in</strong>equality EC ≪ EJ, correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to strong tunnel<strong>in</strong>g, turns out to be the conditon for apply<strong>in</strong>g GP-theory. In this limit the<br />

qunatum phase fluctuations are small while the occupation number fluctuations are large. In<br />

the opposite case of weak tunnel<strong>in</strong>g EC ≫ EJ the relative phases are distributed <strong>in</strong> a r<strong>and</strong>om<br />

way, while fluctuations <strong>in</strong> the occupations numbers are small.<br />

Discrete nonl<strong>in</strong>ear Schröd<strong>in</strong>ger equation<br />

The dynamical equations (10.11,10.12) with the quantities δ l,l′<br />

,δ l,l′<br />

µ ,µl evaluated us<strong>in</strong>g fgn=0<br />

are equivalent to the Discrete Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear Schröd<strong>in</strong>ger Equation (DNLS) for the discrete wavefunction<br />

ψl<br />

i¯h ˙ ψl = − δgn=0<br />

2<br />

(ψl+1 + ψl−1)+U|ψl(t)| 2 ψl(t), (10.57)<br />

which can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g the ansatz (10.15) with the s<strong>in</strong>gle particle Wannier functions.<br />

Here, δgn=0 governs the tunnel<strong>in</strong>g between neighbour<strong>in</strong>g wells <strong>and</strong> U =˜gn describes on-site<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions. The DNLS has been used for example <strong>in</strong> [147] to <strong>in</strong>vestigate nonl<strong>in</strong>ear phenomena<br />

like solitons <strong>and</strong> breathers. In the next chapter, we will use it to study sound propagation <strong>in</strong><br />

the presence of a lattice.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!