15.04.2013 Views

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120 Macroscopic Dynamics<br />

The appearance of this quantity <strong>in</strong> the Euler equation (9.18), confirms this statement: There,<br />

<br />

the quantity ∂/∂nM (m/m∗ )nM(m/2)v2 <br />

z replaces the term ∂/∂nM nM(m/2)v2 <br />

z we would<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> without lattice where nM = ns.<br />

The hydrodynamic equations (9.17,9.18) can be further generalized to account for larger<br />

condensate velocities. This is the topic of the subsequent section.<br />

9.3 Hydrodynamic equations for large currents<br />

In order to derive the hydrodynamic equations (9.17,9.18) for larger condensate velocities,<br />

we need to generalize the energy functional (9.12). This is done by modify<strong>in</strong>g the energy<br />

contribution due to the current <strong>in</strong> lattice direction: The contribution (m/2)(m/m ∗ (nM))v 2 zM +<br />

ε(nM) is replaced by the more general expression ε(vzM =¯hk/m; nM), the latter be<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

energy of a Bloch state condensate (6.4) at average density nM, quasi-momentum ¯hk <strong>and</strong><br />

macroscopic superfluid velocity vMz =¯hk/m. Note that, for convenience, we <strong>in</strong>clude the<br />

groundstate energy ε(nM) <strong>in</strong> the term ε(vzM =¯hk/m; nM). In this way, we obta<strong>in</strong> the energy<br />

functional<br />

<br />

E =<br />

<br />

m<br />

dr<br />

2 nMv 2 Mx + m<br />

2 nMv 2 <br />

My + nMε(vMz =¯hk/m; nM)+nMVext , (9.21)<br />

which <strong>in</strong> terms of the phase def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> (9.10) can be rewritten <strong>in</strong> the form<br />

<br />

m<br />

E = dr<br />

2 nM<br />

2 ∂SM<br />

+<br />

∂x<br />

m<br />

2 nM<br />

<br />

2<br />

∂SM<br />

+ nMε(∂zSM = k; nM)+nMVext .(9.22)<br />

∂y<br />

In writ<strong>in</strong>g this expression we have used the fact that accord<strong>in</strong>g to (9.7,9.10)<br />

∂zSM = k. (9.23)<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g this identity <strong>and</strong> the action pr<strong>in</strong>ciple employed above, we f<strong>in</strong>d the follow<strong>in</strong>g hydrodynamic<br />

equations<br />

∂<br />

∂t nM + ∂x(vMxnM)+∂y(vMynM)+∂z<br />

m ∂<br />

∂t vM<br />

<br />

+ ∇<br />

<br />

1<br />

¯h ∂kε(k;<br />

<br />

nM)nM<br />

Vext + m<br />

2 v2 Mx + m<br />

2 v2 My + µopt(k; nM)<br />

=0. (9.24)<br />

<br />

=0. (9.25)<br />

The second equation <strong>in</strong>volves the chemical potential (6.5) of a Bloch states condensate with<br />

quasi-momentum ¯hk at average density nM for Vext =0. When us<strong>in</strong>g the hydrodynamic<br />

equations (9.24,9.25) it is important to keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that k is a function of r <strong>and</strong> essentially<br />

represents the z-component of the macroscopic velocity field vMz =¯hk/m.<br />

The generalized hydrodynamic equations (9.24,9.25) have been reported <strong>in</strong> [138] for the<br />

tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g regime with the density-dependent effective mass <strong>and</strong> the equation of state<br />

µopt =˜gnM <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> [107] for a general equation of state µopt(nM) <strong>and</strong> general dispersion<br />

ε(k; nM), hence for any lattice potential depth.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!