Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Bose-Einstein Condensates in Rotating Traps and Optical ... - BEC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
120 Macroscopic Dynamics<br />
The appearance of this quantity <strong>in</strong> the Euler equation (9.18), confirms this statement: There,<br />
<br />
the quantity ∂/∂nM (m/m∗ )nM(m/2)v2 <br />
z replaces the term ∂/∂nM nM(m/2)v2 <br />
z we would<br />
obta<strong>in</strong> without lattice where nM = ns.<br />
The hydrodynamic equations (9.17,9.18) can be further generalized to account for larger<br />
condensate velocities. This is the topic of the subsequent section.<br />
9.3 Hydrodynamic equations for large currents<br />
In order to derive the hydrodynamic equations (9.17,9.18) for larger condensate velocities,<br />
we need to generalize the energy functional (9.12). This is done by modify<strong>in</strong>g the energy<br />
contribution due to the current <strong>in</strong> lattice direction: The contribution (m/2)(m/m ∗ (nM))v 2 zM +<br />
ε(nM) is replaced by the more general expression ε(vzM =¯hk/m; nM), the latter be<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
energy of a Bloch state condensate (6.4) at average density nM, quasi-momentum ¯hk <strong>and</strong><br />
macroscopic superfluid velocity vMz =¯hk/m. Note that, for convenience, we <strong>in</strong>clude the<br />
groundstate energy ε(nM) <strong>in</strong> the term ε(vzM =¯hk/m; nM). In this way, we obta<strong>in</strong> the energy<br />
functional<br />
<br />
E =<br />
<br />
m<br />
dr<br />
2 nMv 2 Mx + m<br />
2 nMv 2 <br />
My + nMε(vMz =¯hk/m; nM)+nMVext , (9.21)<br />
which <strong>in</strong> terms of the phase def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> (9.10) can be rewritten <strong>in</strong> the form<br />
<br />
m<br />
E = dr<br />
2 nM<br />
2 ∂SM<br />
+<br />
∂x<br />
m<br />
2 nM<br />
<br />
2<br />
∂SM<br />
+ nMε(∂zSM = k; nM)+nMVext .(9.22)<br />
∂y<br />
In writ<strong>in</strong>g this expression we have used the fact that accord<strong>in</strong>g to (9.7,9.10)<br />
∂zSM = k. (9.23)<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g this identity <strong>and</strong> the action pr<strong>in</strong>ciple employed above, we f<strong>in</strong>d the follow<strong>in</strong>g hydrodynamic<br />
equations<br />
∂<br />
∂t nM + ∂x(vMxnM)+∂y(vMynM)+∂z<br />
m ∂<br />
∂t vM<br />
<br />
+ ∇<br />
<br />
1<br />
¯h ∂kε(k;<br />
<br />
nM)nM<br />
Vext + m<br />
2 v2 Mx + m<br />
2 v2 My + µopt(k; nM)<br />
=0. (9.24)<br />
<br />
=0. (9.25)<br />
The second equation <strong>in</strong>volves the chemical potential (6.5) of a Bloch states condensate with<br />
quasi-momentum ¯hk at average density nM for Vext =0. When us<strong>in</strong>g the hydrodynamic<br />
equations (9.24,9.25) it is important to keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that k is a function of r <strong>and</strong> essentially<br />
represents the z-component of the macroscopic velocity field vMz =¯hk/m.<br />
The generalized hydrodynamic equations (9.24,9.25) have been reported <strong>in</strong> [138] for the<br />
tight b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g regime with the density-dependent effective mass <strong>and</strong> the equation of state<br />
µopt =˜gnM <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> [107] for a general equation of state µopt(nM) <strong>and</strong> general dispersion<br />
ε(k; nM), hence for any lattice potential depth.