25.04.2013 Views

Chapter 1 - Núria BONADA

Chapter 1 - Núria BONADA

Chapter 1 - Núria BONADA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 6<br />

11- Rhyacophila pascoei McLachlan, 1879<br />

MATERIAL STUDIED: 1L<br />

Guadalfeo Basin: GU16<br />

DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY<br />

Central and southern European species. In the Iberian Peninsula it has been recorded in<br />

central and southern basins (González et al., 1992).<br />

This species has been found in rivers with high contents of sulphates and carbonates<br />

concentrations in southern basins (García de Jalón & González del Tánago, 1986). In our<br />

sampled basins, larvae of Rh. pascoei was found in a middle reach of a siliceous basin<br />

with a fair biological quality.<br />

12- Rhyacophila relicta McLachlan, 1879<br />

MATERIAL STUDIED: 39L<br />

Ter Basin: T10, T12<br />

Tordera Basin: ToM9<br />

Llobregat Basin: L42, L54, L64, L68, L60a, L67<br />

DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY<br />

Endemic species from the Iberian Peninsula and Pyrenees.<br />

This species has been found very abundant in middle rivers (see Vieira-Lanero, 2000). We<br />

also have recorded it in headwaters but infrequent. According to González del Tánago &<br />

García de Jalón (1984) Rh. relicta is an intolerant species to pollution.<br />

13- Rhyacophila gr. tristis Pictet, 1834<br />

MATERIAL STUDIED: 102L, 6♂ (V, VII, VIII)<br />

Ter Basin: T2, T3, T5, T8, T10, T11, TM4, TM5<br />

Tordera Basin: ToM13<br />

Besòs Basin: B32<br />

Llobregat Basin: L44, L45, L54, L56, L60a<br />

Noguera Ribagorçana Basin: OUT0m, OUT200m, INLET<br />

Júcar Basin: JU7<br />

TAXONOMIC REMARKS<br />

The imago found in Mongrony River (Oriental Pyrenees) has several taxonomic features<br />

similar to Rh. aquitanica cited by Navás in closer areas (see González et al., 1992).<br />

However, this specimen has been considered as Rh. gr. tristis because the absence of key<br />

characters to differentiate both species with certainty and the high variability known in<br />

Rh. tristis males (M. A. González, pers. comm.). In the same way, there are difficulties to<br />

distinguish larvae of Rh. tristis and Rh. aquitanica. Buholzer (1978) observed that Rh.<br />

tristis does not present ventral transversal stripes in the cephalic capsule, whereas Rh.<br />

aquitanica does. In the northwest of Spain, where only Rh. tristis has been found, larvae<br />

present transversal stripes (R. Vieira-Lanero, pers comm.), as in our specimens.<br />

Consequently, we have included all specimens into the Rh. gr. tristis.<br />

214

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!