02.05.2013 Views

The Historiographical Development of the Concept “mfecane” and ...

The Historiographical Development of the Concept “mfecane” and ...

The Historiographical Development of the Concept “mfecane” and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

than he hi<strong>the</strong>rto believed’, 89 <strong>and</strong> to make o<strong>the</strong>r modifications in <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> new<br />

research, but he <strong>and</strong> many o<strong>the</strong>rs maintain that <strong>the</strong>re was none<strong>the</strong>less an<br />

mfecane <strong>and</strong> that it was essentially about positive, African-initiated, state-<br />

building based on African institutions. 90 <strong>The</strong> debate led to an increased interest<br />

by scholars <strong>of</strong>, <strong>and</strong> research in, early nineteenth century history, with its zenith<br />

being <strong>the</strong> “'Mfecane' Aftermath" conference at Wits in 1991. Although <strong>the</strong><br />

conference adopted a motion that <strong>the</strong> mfecane was dead <strong>and</strong> should be buried,<br />

<strong>the</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> conference papers, eventually published by Hamilton, contained<br />

many pro- <strong>and</strong> only a few anti-mfecane papers. 91 Missing in particular was<br />

Cobbing’s contribution, which he withdrew as he felt <strong>the</strong> changes dem<strong>and</strong>ed by<br />

<strong>the</strong> editor would have distorted his arguments. 92 Morton described it as a ‘ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

jumbled volume, reflecting an array <strong>of</strong> outlooks <strong>and</strong> methodologies’. 93 He <strong>the</strong>n<br />

concluded that ‘various contributors in this volume examine aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

Cobbing’s arguments in great detail. Generally, <strong>the</strong>y refute his positions, but at<br />

<strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> it all a lot <strong>of</strong> what he has to say st<strong>and</strong>s up’. 94 It is Wylie’s opinion that<br />

‘<strong>the</strong> prickly defensiveness with which Cobbing’s <strong>the</strong>sis has been greeted<br />

89 Morton, ‘Agonising', 111.<br />

90 Ibid., 111.<br />

91 Hamilton, Mfecane Aftermath.<br />

92 For <strong>the</strong> strong pro-mfecane contributions see: Hamilton, Saunders, Eldredge, Peires, Omer-<br />

Cooper, Hartley, Kinsman. For <strong>the</strong> strong anti-mfecane contributions see: Wright, Wylie,<br />

Webster, Gewald. Regarding Cobbing’s non-contribution, personal communication from<br />

Cobbing, 1992.<br />

93 Morton, ‘Agonising', 100.<br />

94 Ibid., 105. See also D. Van Heerden, ‘First <strong>The</strong>re is History’. C.C. Saunders, ‘Conference<br />

Report: Mfecane Afterthoughts’, Social Dynamics, 17 (1991), 171-177. E<strong>the</strong>rington, ‘Aftermath<br />

<strong>of</strong> Aftermath’. ‘Mfecane Never Existed?’. G. Dominy, ‘Myths, Manipulation <strong>and</strong> Nettles:<br />

Historians <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Shaping <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mfecane Controversy: A Critical Introduction’, in Edgecombe<br />

et al., Debate on Zulu Origins. 'Too Black <strong>and</strong> White for Fiction', <strong>The</strong> Guardian Weekly, 19 - 25<br />

June, 1992, 24. Kros, ‘Zulu-Centric Difeqane', 56-58. J.D. Omer-Cooper, ‘Has <strong>the</strong> Mfecane a<br />

Future? A Response to <strong>the</strong> Cobbing Critique’, Journal <strong>of</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn African Studies, 19 (June<br />

1993), 273-94. J.B. Peires, ‘Paradigm Deleted: <strong>The</strong> Materialist Interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mfecane’,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn African Studies, 19 (June 1993), 295-313. H.J. Van Aswegen, ‘Die<br />

Mfecane: Werklikheid <strong>of</strong> Mite?’, Historia, 39 (Mei 1994), 19-32. K. Breckenridge, ‘On <strong>the</strong><br />

Mfecane Aftermath’, Alternation, 4 (1997), 247-49.<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!