02.05.2013 Views

The Historiographical Development of the Concept “mfecane” and ...

The Historiographical Development of the Concept “mfecane” and ...

The Historiographical Development of the Concept “mfecane” and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

accepted by later authors as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dominant discourse on <strong>the</strong> Fingo <strong>and</strong><br />

remains so to this day.<br />

<strong>The</strong> main thrust <strong>of</strong> Godlonton’s work was that Africans were savage <strong>and</strong> warlike<br />

people, making it imperative for <strong>the</strong> governments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cape <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> to<br />

protect <strong>the</strong> whole eastern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colony. Had it not been for <strong>the</strong> brave<br />

defence by <strong>the</strong> hardy settlers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eastern Cape, <strong>the</strong>ir l<strong>and</strong>, cattle <strong>and</strong><br />

possessions would have been in jeopardy. Thus all African actors <strong>and</strong> actions<br />

had to be portrayed in as vicious a light as possible, <strong>and</strong> settlers, as well as<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir actions, as heroic. Godlonton’s contribution to mfecane historiography was<br />

<strong>the</strong> portrayal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three African monsters destroying o<strong>the</strong>r chiefdoms inside<br />

<strong>the</strong> “blank space”, leaving <strong>the</strong> Europeans at its edge to collect <strong>the</strong> refugees.<br />

Though published in Grahamstown, <strong>the</strong>se volumes were widely read in <strong>the</strong><br />

colony <strong>and</strong> in Europe, <strong>and</strong> for <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century were<br />

considered <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard work on <strong>the</strong> war <strong>of</strong> 1834/5 <strong>and</strong> on <strong>the</strong> Fingo, <strong>and</strong> <strong>The</strong>al<br />

thought <strong>the</strong>m ‘thoroughly reliable history’. 89<br />

In 1836, <strong>the</strong> same year in which two <strong>of</strong> Godlonton’s volumes appeared, ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

book, Travels <strong>and</strong> Adventures in Eastern Africa, crucial to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong><br />

mfecane historiography, was published by Isaacs. 90 Of all <strong>the</strong> authors who<br />

published books, Wylie regards Isaacs as <strong>the</strong> only Port Natal trader who was<br />

‘… enveloped in a violently alien culture …’ from 1825-1831. 91 Isaacs was a 17-<br />

year-old, under-educated youth with ties to <strong>the</strong> Solomon family, who were<br />

merchants in St. Helena, Cape Town <strong>and</strong> London. In 1825 J.S. King, captaining<br />

<strong>the</strong> Mary from London to Port Natal via Cape Town, stopped at St. Helena.<br />

Isaacs, having worked <strong>the</strong>re for three years for his uncle, travelled with King to<br />

Port Natal where he became his junior partner <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n inherited all his Port<br />

Natal assets after King’s death in September 1828. In June 1830 he became<br />

Fynn’s partner <strong>and</strong> finally left Natal in late January 1831. That same year he<br />

89 G.M. <strong>The</strong>al, Compendium <strong>of</strong> South African History <strong>and</strong> Geography (3rd. edition, Lovedale,<br />

1877), iv, quoted in Peires, House <strong>of</strong> Phalo, 179.<br />

90 Isaacs, Travels <strong>and</strong> Adventures, 2 Vols.<br />

91 Wylie, 'Autobiography as Alibi’, 79.<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!