04.05.2013 Views

Final EIAR - Aurecon AME Environmental | Environmental Projects

Final EIAR - Aurecon AME Environmental | Environmental Projects

Final EIAR - Aurecon AME Environmental | Environmental Projects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proposed Wind and Solar (Photovoltaic) Energy Facilities on Kangnas Farm near Springbok in the Northern Cape: <strong>Final</strong> EIR 111<br />

should be addressed, implemented and monitored in terms of the EMP for the<br />

construction phase.<br />

• Any septic tanks constructed for the project should be located at least 100 m (measured<br />

from top of bank) from the ephemeral streams and at least 1 000 m away from the<br />

springs or any boreholes/wellpoints.<br />

• Storm water run-off infrastructure must be maintained to mitigate both the flow and water<br />

quality impacts of any storm water leaving the energy facilities site. Should any erosion<br />

features develop, they should be stabilised as soon as possible.<br />

The same measures as recommended for the proposed wind energy facility should be<br />

implemented.<br />

4.4.5 Impact on heritage resources<br />

Heritage resources include archaeological material (e.g. rock paintings, stone tools),<br />

palaeontological material (e.g. fossilised materials) and cultural heritage material (e.g. old<br />

graveyards, fences or ruins of buildings). Since some potential heritage material is buried, it is<br />

often only found during the construction phase of a project. A large scale development such as<br />

the proposed projects could have a negative impact on the archaeological and cultural heritage<br />

resources (including visual, landscape and sense of place impacts) by damaging or destroying<br />

such material or by requiring the material to be removed and stored in situ. As such a heritage<br />

impact study was undertaken by Mr Jayson Orton. A site survey was conducted from 23-<br />

28 July 2012. The Heritage Impact Assessment is included in Annexure H. The findings and<br />

recommendations of the study are summarised below.<br />

a) Description of the environment<br />

The landscape on and around the study area is dominated by two strongly contrasting<br />

components namely low rocky inselbergs and ranges of hills with flat grassland in between.<br />

During the site survey a large number of heritage occurrences were recorded.<br />

Pre-colonial archaeology<br />

The best pre-colonial sites are often found in caves. These are very rare in the Bushmanland<br />

landscape however four are located on the site. Two of these caves contain rock art, the third<br />

cave had only two quartz artefacts and the fourth cave was located in a small rocky valley and<br />

seemed to contain only light traces of occupation. These traces consisted of fragments of burnt<br />

bone, some fragments of ostrich eggshell and pottery and a few quartz flaked stone artefacts.<br />

The majority of archaeological sites recorded contained scatters of stone artefacts,<br />

predominantly in quartz (milky and clear) and cryptocrystalline silica (CCS) with silcrete,<br />

quartzite and other rocks more rarely represented (Figure 4.22: Stone artefacts that occurred<br />

near the base of hill on the western side of the site (J Orton, 2012))<br />

© <strong>Aurecon</strong> (2012) No unauthorised reproduction, copy<br />

or adaptation, in whole or in part, may be made.<br />

P:\<strong>Projects</strong>\108495 Kangnas WEF & PV EIA's\3 Project Delivery\4 Reports\FEIR\FEIR 210213 <strong>Final</strong>.doc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!