Final EIAR - Aurecon AME Environmental | Environmental Projects
Final EIAR - Aurecon AME Environmental | Environmental Projects
Final EIAR - Aurecon AME Environmental | Environmental Projects
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Proposed Wind and Solar (Photovoltaic) Energy Facilities on Kangnas Farm near Springbok in the Northern Cape: <strong>Final</strong> EIR 52<br />
Various technology alternatives were considered in terms of the following:<br />
• Solar panel type: PV vs CPV; and<br />
• Mounting system: trackers vs fixed mount<br />
3.4.5.3 Solar panel type<br />
Two solar panel types, i.e. PV solar cells and CPV, were considered for the proposed solar<br />
plant. The CPV technology use mirrors or lenses to concentrate sunlight onto a small area to<br />
generate electricity directly onto the collector PV cells. Both PV and CPV have been considered<br />
in the EIA phase.<br />
3.4.5.4 Mounting system<br />
Solar panels can be mounted in various ways to ensure maximum exposure of the PV panels to<br />
sunlight. In a fixed axis system the PV panels are installed at a set tilt and cannot move,<br />
whereas in a one or two (dual) axes tracking system the panels follow the sun to ensure<br />
maximum exposure to sunlight 23 . These systems are illustrated in Figure 3.12.<br />
A B C<br />
Figure 3.12: Solar panels can be mounted via (a) fixed axis photovoltaic systems,<br />
(b) single axis tracking PV systems and (c) dual axis tracking systems 24<br />
Mainstream will investigate all three these alternative mounting options for the PV panels.<br />
3.4.5.5 Foundation options<br />
There are various methods for anchoring PV panels. However the preferred foundation option<br />
would be dependent on the soil characteristics of the area, as these anchoring structures would<br />
need to withstand climatic conditions, as well as the response of the soil to these changes, to<br />
prolong the lifespan of the panels. A geotechnical assessment would however be required to<br />
determine the soil conditions and the type of anchoring required.<br />
3.4.6 Summary of alternatives<br />
To summarise, the feasible alternatives which are assessed in the EIR include the following:<br />
23<br />
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_tracker#Tracker_type_selection (Accessed on:<br />
24 October 2011)<br />
24<br />
Source: www.solar-tracking.com/ (Accessed on: 24/10/2011)<br />
© <strong>Aurecon</strong> (2012) No unauthorised reproduction, copy<br />
or adaptation, in whole or in part, may be made.<br />
P:\<strong>Projects</strong>\108495 Kangnas WEF & PV EIA's\3 Project Delivery\4 Reports\FEIR\FEIR 210213 <strong>Final</strong>.doc