TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 92 -
inquest states natural causes. Then a second inquest follows and reveals the first pathologist had missed
what now appears to be a stab wound. Are we now to expect to believe this doesn‘t alter the situation? Of
course it does, and more importantly, - if this is how are present system is run, then no wonder it‘s wide
open to abuse, as this allows a whole array of injustices to continuously occur. [2]
Let‘s not forget here, they‘re virtually all Freemason‘s who are involved. - Take the case that some bigwig
of a pathologist performs an inquest into someone‘s death, but blatantly makes some mistakes that is
detrimental to the correct verdict being reached. Then another inquest is called for, but this time being
taken by some subordinate pathologist, a fellow Mason. Do you think he will override his superiors
incorrect initial findings, knowing full well he still has years ahead of him to rise within his profession and
to gain more credence by his fellow brethren at his local lodge,- I really don‘t think so, do you, as what
would most likely happen, is he‘d overlook, turn a blind and agree with his superior?
As a matter of interest; the Temple Bar consists of what are called Inns of Court. There are four Inns of
Court as follows: Inner Temple, Middle Temple, Lincoln‘s Inn and Gray‘s Inn. It is believed that the Inner
Temple controls the legal system of Canada and Britain, while the Middle Temple controls the legal
system of the United States, though all Inns are themselves controlled by the same few at the top. The
Templars established their headquarters at a London temple, which still exists today and is called Temple
Bar, located in the City of London, between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment. [3]
Thanks to the invention of the mobile phone with built in video cameras, for if it was not due to the
owner of one of these telephone cameras who was able to capture the vital moment of the completely
unprovoked attack by the sadistic TSG police officer who beat and shoved the innocent, strolling along
with hands in pockets Ian Tomlinson, the world may have never been alerted to the despicable act carried
out by a representative of the law. It‘s been alleged [and another reason this case has to be heard], the
same policeman involved, had previously been kicked out of the force, and no doubt got his Masonic
friends to get him back in again, because he was readmitted into the police force some time after he was
expelled from it. - It‘s as if they go through a special rotating door in Hendon, the Houses of Parliament
and House Lords, look at Peter Mandleson, Pro Bono [for the public good] Baron Goldsmith, Conrad
Black and Lord Jeffery Archer to name but a few!
Minutes following being attacked by this vicious policeman, Tomlinson collapsed and died, reportedly
of a heart attack. His attacker did his utmost not to be recognised by covering-up his identity numbers, and
wearing a face mask, and begs reason as to why they do, - as they obviously do so, so they can then inflict
some kind of harm, or commit a crime without fear of being caught out, imagine how many officers
regularly do this, and especially when they know they‘re not being filmed.
Tomlinson had been roughed up by the police only a few minutes before and then again later, and after
that initial beating, is it any wonder the poor man collapsed and died. This is how blatant the police are,
even after millions of people have seen with their own eyes the video footage showing the incident, the
police appear to be going back down the road of a ―cover-up‖.
On the 6/9/2009 in an interview with the Guardian, Tomlinson‘s widow, Julia, and son, Paul King,
spoke for the first time about the anger, hurt and frustration they have felt in the months since his death.
They said they felt they had been pressured by the City of London police, Scotland Yard and the IPCC not
to speak out. The family said police had prevented them from viewing Tomlinson‘s body for six days after
his death. Police initially tried to persuade them there was nothing suspicious about the death and gave
them only an edited version of his first post-mortem examination. Telling the family he had ―Died of a
heart attack‖, police made no mention of significant injuries found on Tomlinson‘s body. [4]
The family said they could no longer keep silent when the IPCC announced this week that it had
completed its investigation and handed a file to the CPS. The family believe police misled them over
Tomlinson‘s death from the outset. Police then refused to allow her to see his body in the Royal London
Hospital, she added; ―Six days later, I wasn‘t allowed to go and see him, I didn‘t understand why they
didn‘t want me to go and see him – if someone dies of a heart attack, you get to go and see him. But they
weren‘t letting me‖. They also disclosed that, when a post-mortem examination was completed three days
after Tomlinson died, police gave them an edited version of the results. The family were not told that a
forensic pathologist had found large amounts of blood in his stomach, a suspected dog bite on his leg and a
number of other injuries. Paul King said: ―We‘ve been confused by the City police, Metropolitan police,
IPCC to not say anything: - Don‘t say anything, because you'll jeopardise the case. - I think we've been so
confused with all that – don‘t say this, don't say that, even down to don't talk to the media – they've made