TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 138 -
controlled by Johnson who had the motives due to his own self preservation to assist in such a coup d‘état,
as he was already facing conspiracy of, or the murder of agricultural agent Henry Marshall in Texas. He
knew Kennedy was ready to drop him like a stone from office in 1964 for that very same reason, - his
mafia ties and the recently uncovered Texas murder sprees. Johnson also knew that segregation would be
‗key‘ in uniting those segregationist conspirators in the CIA, FBI and the military, etc., and seems to have
been pushed into a corner. He had the murder cases still outstanding, and was no doubt being pressurised
by his Masonic segregationist lobbyists and advisers, that was enough for him to lead Kennedy
unknowingly into an awaiting ambush in Dallas. Knowing what politicians and even your average person
in the street is like, had they been in the same position as Johnson‘s, then it‘s likely they too would have
done the same as what he did.
Johnson, as a Freemason, was surrounded by segregationists, such as Scottish Rite 33 rd degree
Freemason J. Edgar Hoover, and he used them to do his dirty work when it was convenient. Though it‘s
also been said that Johnson generally act independently once in power, making it clear to all, that the
segregationists he worked with in the coup d‘état, would not dictate his agenda. Or did he? - Despite
signing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and pushing for it, it‘s alleged Johnson was also the main protagonist
in the assassinations of Robert F. Kennedy [RFK], and Martin Luther King. In the case of RFK, Johnson
knew he was onto him, and should RFK become president, - not only would he face justice, but so would
all those who helped him. [1] Then as for King, who was at that time fiercely protesting against the war in
Vietnam, his assassination would not have been possible without Johnson‘s, nudge, nod and a wink.
[1] "Rigorous Intuition (v. 2.0): The things that don't add up." .
Masonic Involvement in JFK‟s Assassination
Arlen Specter [1] since 1981 has played a significant role in Supreme Court. – Prior to this and on the
recommendation of Gerald R. Ford, he worked for the ‗Warren Commission‘, investigating the
assassination of John F. Kennedy. As an assistant counsel for the commission, he co-authored the
controversial ‗single bullet theory‘, which suggested the non-fatal wounds to Kennedy and wounds to
Texas Governor John Connally were caused by the same bullet.
This was a crucial assertion for the ‗Warren Commission‘, since if the ‗two‘ of them had been wounded
by separate bullets, that would have demonstrated the presence of a second assassin and therefore proof
Lee Harvey Oswald didn‘t work alone [2] .
Arlen Specter‘s involvement in the ‗single bullet theory‘ is to this very day proudly displayed on his
own website under his biography section, which just goes to show you that despite all the evidence
contrary to this own theory, - and the as obvious as the nose on your face that Kennedy was indeed
assassinated by more than ‗one‘ person, just goes to show you how important it is to still keep the ‗single
bullet theory‘ alive and well today, and almost 48 years later, - which doesn‘t bode well for the 9/11
Truthers.
Specter worked on the Judiciary Committee which included writing significant legislation on dealing
with Constitutional law, civil rights and privacy. It‘s said his work as Philadelphia‘s District Attorney
gave him insights to write the Terrorist Prosecution Act, the Armed Career Criminal Act and is a co-author
of the Second Chance Act. It‘s was Specter in the Washington Post that broadcast the findings of the most
discredited and corrupt murder investigation in American history, - that it‘s noted that whilst filming JFK –
The story that won‘t go away, things were running smoothly, when suddenly several attacks on the film
and it‘s director Oliver Stone began to surface in the media. [3]
On the 19th May 1991, the Washington Post ran a mocking and scornful article by national security
correspondent George Lardner entitled, ―On the Set: Dallas in Wonderland‖, which said; ―...the
absurdities and palpable untruths in Garrison‘s book and Stone‘s rendition of it‖. The article pointed out
that District Attorney Jim Garrison [who was the appointed DA to investigate into the death of JFK], had
lost his case against Clay Shaw and claimed that he inflated his case by trying to use Shaw‘s homosexual
relationships to prove guilt by association [4] . Stone responded to Lardner‘s article by hiring a public
relations firm that specialised in political issues. Other attacks in the media soon followed. Anthony
Lewis in the New York Times claimed that the film; ―...tells us that our government cannot be trusted to
give an honest account of a Presidential assassination‖. - Washington Post columnist George Will
attacked Stone, calling him; ―...a man of technical skill, scant education and negligible conscience‖.
Ironically the Warren Commission, which created by President Lyndon B Johnson [LBJ], and as
already said, who wouldn‘t have been in the running for office in 1964, as he was about to be prosecuted