TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 99 -
by the IPCC. [10] The family claim that when Mr Saunders, was shot on the 6th May 2008, he had not fired
his weapon for around 20 minutes. The legal papers also claim that a negotiator talking to the gunman was
impeded by the noise of the police helicopters and say there were repeated recorded requests by officers
for the helicopters to move away so that negotiations could continue - including ten seconds before Mr
Saunders was fatally wounded.
Now this shows you how insincere many of the police officers are, and who are in fact often itching to
blow someone‘s brains out. A Metropolitan police firearms officer who may have fired the deadly shot that
killed Mark Saunders was removed from firearms duty after allegedly inserting song titles into his oral
evidence at the dead man‘s inquest. [11] The IPCC confirmed it is investigating the unnamed officer, who
gave evidence as Alpha Zulu 8 or AZ8, after it emerged that he had been reprimanded by his superior
shortly after giving evidence on the 27th September 2010. An examination of the transcript shows that
evidence given by AZ8 contained a number of phrases which are also the titles of songs, including Enough
is Enough by Donna Summer, Point of No Return by Buzzcocks, Line of Fire by Journey, Quiet Moments
by Chris de Burgh, Kicking Myself by As Tall As Lions and Fuck My Old Boots by the Membranes.
Again what might be new news to some people, is old hat to others, [12] as many a police officer will
know this kind of playacting has been done hundreds of times throughout many people‘s trials, as we used
to do it at work when I sold photocopiers and computers, as did some radio DJ‘s, when during their shows,
when in their case, they would have to get the person to unknowingly say the title to certain well known
song. As in the case of me and my workmates, we would say stupid things such as; ―Can I speak to Mr
Head please‖, and the receptionist would look down the list of names, and reply; ―Sorry Sir, we don‘t
have a Mr Head working here‖, and we‘d go on and say; ―What you talking about, Dicks one of the bosses
who owns your company dear lady, if I were you, I‘d ask a another member of staff about Mr Head, they
might know him as Richard, but his my mate, so I call him Dick‖. And if the receptionist didn‘t twig on
you was asking to speak to ―dickhead‖, and she went away to ask a colleague, you ―won‖ the bet. But how
could anyone do this in such tragic circumstances, and just goes to show you how much they really value
someone‘s life, don‘t respect the law they‘re supposed to represent, nor care about the validity of the trials
to begin with, to the majority, and not just a few bad apples, it‘s ‗all just a game‘ to them.
On 2/6/2006 in Forest Gate London- Operation Volga - 250 Police Officers, spearheaded by CO19
SFO‘s, raided an address in Lansdown Road, Forest Gate, London. Intelligence from MI5 suggested that
the house, home to Muslim brothers Abul Kahar Kalam and Abul Koyair Kalam, contained terrorist
materials, possibly including chemical/biological weapons, and, accordingly, CO19 wore protective suits
on this operation. During the operation, Abul Kahar Kalam was wounded by a single shot from one of the
CO19 officers. Initial reports claimed that the shot, from an HK MP5, was accidental, the result of a
struggle on the stairs between the CO19 officer and Mr Kahar. Speculation remains that the bulky
protective suits worn by CO19 may have contributed to the accidental discharge. [9] If that was the genuine
cause, then why hadn‘t they sussed out this kind of problem long before this particular raid? Operation
Volga caused controversy, not just due to the shooting but also because no terrorist material was
discovered and the two brothers were cleared of any terrorism offences. An IPCC investigation was to later
clear [how often are we to hear this], the CO19 officer who had fired the shot of any wrong doing.
Controversy also surrounds reports that MI5 had relied on a single informer [who may had perhaps had a
vendetta or dispute with the brothers] when raising the alarm about the two brothers.
James Ashley was a 39-year-old man who was shot dead by armed police while unarmed and naked and
whom had been asleep in bed with his girlfriend during a raid on his flat at 4am in St Leonards, Hastings
on the 15/1/1998. [13] Ashley had been involved in a bar brawl stabbing several months earlier, although
only in so much as a friend of his attacked someone else before Ashley pulled him away. [14] The officers
were instructed to search the flat using the high risk ―Bermuda method‖ favoured for dealing with
terrorism. But in typical Keystone Kop‘s fashion, they had no plans of the interior, which meant officers
had bumped into an ironing board and had been delayed as they had to force open an unexpected
communal door. When PC Christopher Sherwood stepped into the darkened room on his first ever armed
raid, he alleged he thought Mr Ashley was attacking him, so shot him and at close range. Mr Ashley‘s
girlfriend Caroline Courtland-Smith, who was 18 at the time, said Mr Ashley had been walking towards
the door to investigate noises they had heard. PC Sherwood was subsequently charged with murder and
manslaughter.
But in May 2001, he was cleared at the Old Bailey on the judge‘s direction. Again we have to question,
why is it in cases as such as this, do these kind of judges and those with such power of influence, keep
interfering with the due process of the law, and why do they not just leave it to us the public to decided