TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 109 -
Vatican‖. It went on to report that in 2001, while he was a cardinal, he issued a secret Vatican edict to
Catholic bishops all over the world, instructing them to put the Church‘s interests ahead of child safety.
The document recommended that rather than reporting sexual abuse to the relevant legal authorities,
bishops should encourage the victim, witnesses and perpetrator not to talk about it. And, to keep victims
quiet, it threatened that if they repeat the allegations they would be excommunicated. – Then on the BBC
on 3rd March 2010 Cardinal Angelo Sodano, dean of the College of Cardinals said; ―the Roman Catholic
faithful will not be swayed by petty gossip about child sex-abuse allegations‖, and made the remark in an
unusual message of support to Pope Benedict XVI during Easter Mass. The Pope did not mention the
scandal directly in his Easter address. He said humanity was suffering from a profound crisis and needed
spiritual and moral conversion. [8]
[1] "Lawyers for pope seek immunity from US lawsuit over abuses ..." .
[2] "Neil Bush, Ratzinger co-founders.".
[3] .
[4] .
[5] .
[6] "Pope is immune from lawsuit in sex abuse case, U.S. says ..." .
[7] "US gov't says pope immune from lawsuit - Hürriyet Daily News ..." .
[8] "Catholic cardinal rejects sex abuse 'gossip'." .
22. Blair - No Choice but to become a War Criminal
These so called world leaders and their puppet regimes have been sussed well and truly out, caught red
handed with their hands in the till and blood on their hands. Hypocritical war criminals like Tony Blair,
who converted to Catholicism in December 2007, and in my opinion, not because he did so due to any true
beliefs, or that he had some kind of calling from God, though he‘d love to think we‘d believe that. No,
he‘s done it solely so he can pathetically plead to the gullible masses and beg for forgiveness from his
sheeple and fold, - that what he did when he decided to illegally go to war against Iraq, and stamp the seal
of approval to exterminate hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children, - whose only
crime was to be born there, [as how can these people on one hand tuck into bed their own children, and
their children‘s children, settle them down all nice and snug, whilst proceeding to read them a bedtime
story, or sing a lullaby, - and on the turn of the final page, read;―...and they all lived happily ever after‖, or
sing; ―On hush upon mountain...‖, when on the very next day order the extermination of some other
parents little children?], and that the reason he did it, was for all our sakes, not his, ours, - and to prevent
terrorism on our streets and wipe-out the born and bred by the CIA - al-Qaeda.
The Masonic ‗safe pair of hands‘ of Sir John Chilcot of the Chilcot Inquiry, will amount to nothing, as
on the surface, they, the so called opposition might moan and groan for the sake of the public circus, but
deep down in the depths of their courts, they know their powerless to act, or should I say haven‘t the balls
to act or prosecute a war criminal such as Tony Blair, unless of course someone like me was put in power,
and that ain‘t ever gunna happen! Blair would boldly proclaim; ―...but Sir‘s, I‘m a Godly man, sincere in
my faith and religion, you only have to see I have been in attendance with the Pope, Gods second in
command, - what I did, was what I thought best,- I almost felt as if I was being directly instructed by the
good lord himself‖.
And if Blair was ever haled unto the European courts in the Hague as a ‗war criminal‘, he‘d have a
touch anyway, as those Judges there are in turn also Freemasons, so right from the start it would be a farce
and amount to nothing other than lining the pockets of the legal fraternity with millions of more pounds of
tax payers money.
Let‘s not forget Blair‘s at least a 32nd, though most likely a 33rd degree ‗Honorary Freemason‘, and for
those who say a law was passed barring Prime Minister‘s from being a Freemason, or remaining so whilst
still in office, - are talking out of their rear-end, as there‘s no law stipulating any such thing. And what‘s
interesting to note, is that inside the actual ‗Cabinet Room‘ at number 10, at one end of the room there are
two ornate pillars and the royal arch on prominent show and purposely designed this way as a matter of
aesthetic symbolism as to what it‘s meant to really represent, - as it‘s quite a separate feature from the rest
of the ceiling, so therefore nothing to do with being a necessary part of the building, i.e. required to support
it, so is there to remind those whom are all seated around the cabinet table, ‗whose really in charge‘.