05.06.2013 Views

TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 154 -<br />

resisted the pressure, but Hearst and his Hollywood friends succeeded in getting theatre chains to limit<br />

bookings of Kane, resulting in mediocre box-office numbers and harming Welles career.<br />

[1] "Popular Mechanics facts .<br />

[2] "Hearst Corporation at AllExperts." .<br />

[3] "William Randolph Hearst .<br />

[4] "Yellow Journalism." .<br />

[5] "Citizen Kane .<br />

Who can we trust?<br />

Sadly to say, but it‘s not just our politicians and financial terrorists and banksters who are corrupt, but<br />

so are the majority of today‘s academics and scientists, who too are just a bunch of self serving shady<br />

Alpha, Delta, Kappa like ‗yes-men‘, who are as bent as a butchers meat-hook, and who‘ll do almost<br />

anything for academic fame and fortune. So don‘t be surprised when you read, or hear-off some of their<br />

opinions and debunking theories in such publications like; Popular Mechanics, when in March 2005‘s<br />

issues, they dedicated a critiqued several paged article debunking many of the 9/11 so called conspiracy<br />

theories, despite 1,377 verified architectural and engineering professionals tend to almost totally ‗disagree‘<br />

with the Popular Mechanics article.<br />

Which seems to overlook and completely ignore many of the following facts, - and nor does it suggest<br />

an alternative theory, or offer a convincing enough argument of any real substance in trying to explain. -<br />

why is it; the destruction of the Twin Towers proceeded through the path of greatest resistance, yet did so<br />

at nearly free-fall acceleration, 10 seconds and the buildings were neatly down in their own footprints. 1.<br />

Improbable symmetry of the distribution of debris. 2. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and<br />

flashes. 3. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally. 4. Mid-air pulverisation of 90,000 tons of concrete &<br />

metal decking. 5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds, 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no<br />

pan-caked floors found. 6. Isolated explosive ejections twenty to forty stories below impact. 7. Total<br />

building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame. 8. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3<br />

high-rises. 9. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples. Evidence of explosives<br />

found in dust samples. 10. WTC7-No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire alone has<br />

ever occurred throughout the world before. [1]<br />

Though more importantly is this, if their 9/11 debunking article, was just bunkum, then what else have<br />

they falsely claimed; and ‗Climate-gate‘ comes to mind. See all these yellow journalistic kind of articles<br />

are really meant to do, is spread propaganda, misinformation and myths, whilst trying to dispel and counter<br />

arguments, - because these kind of Popular Mechanics reports, are then on mass repeated in the national<br />

press and media, - who then echo this false information, - so when it comes to the man in the street,<br />

wanting to voice his own opinions; ―That the NIST report or government version is flawed with<br />

inconsistencies and errors‖. Then it gives rise for the ‗50 center‘ to ridicule his observations, and pour<br />

scorn on their doubts, by simple saying: ―What, you trying to tell me, you know more that those academics<br />

who wrote the Popular Mechanics article?‖<br />

And it‘s interesting to note, this debate is never going to go away, until the truth is really been revealed,<br />

and ‗true perpetrators‘ caught and tried, and not some demented patient with custard power in his<br />

underwear. ―What caught my eye, [the ‗Building What? Campaign], is their claim that more than 1,300<br />

architects and engineers examined the evidence about WTC7 and disagree with the official report issued<br />

by the National Institute of Standards and Technology‖, Geraldo Rivera, Fox News, on the 13th November<br />

2010.<br />

I mention 9/11, as my next book is dedicated to the subject, alongside with the 7/7 2005 Bombings in<br />

London - and due to it being the ‗9/11‘ 10th anniversary this summer 2011, as I really think this subject<br />

needs re-scrutinising. I shall be revealing various things that have never yet been considered, and will<br />

hopefully be able prove certain things have fraudulently been manipulated, - and which I am reluctant to<br />

claim as yet, as it‘s quite possible the powers that be [TPTB], may well prevent the book from being<br />

published. I would like to say in advance, in the event of anything untoward happening to me, then the<br />

book will be released on mass online anyway. Paul Zarembka author of The Hidden History of 9-11-2001,<br />

has personally thanked me for raising some very important issues and anomalies that are featured in his<br />

book, and overlooked by so many other writers and investigators into the 9/11 affair. Then in addition to<br />

that information, I also feel that I have been able to prove some very interesting points. That if a public

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!