05.06.2013 Views

TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 180 -<br />

this Masonic world they all reside in, whether they know of it, or agree to do so or not in the first place is<br />

irrelevant, - because that‘s in fact what they all really are.<br />

I am not alone with my anti-Masonic stance, and particularly in its present form, as such anti-Masonic<br />

feelings date back as far as 1869 when Rev. C.G. Finney wrote in his book: The Character, Claims and<br />

Practical Workings of Freemasonry, the following passage, but before you read it, please bear in mind, as I<br />

keep constantly saying, that the majority of all members of the Houses of Parliament and the House of<br />

Congress in the US, are Alpha, Delta, Kappa like members and Freemasons of one kind of oath taking<br />

fraternity or another, and only a handful, not hundreds of people were involved in the main and important<br />

parts of what happened on 9/11/2001. ―Can a man who has taken and still adheres to the oath of the<br />

Royal Arch degree be trusted in office? He swears to espouse the cause of a companion of this degree<br />

when involved in any difficulty, so far as to extricate him from the same, whether he be right or wrong. He<br />

swears to conceal his crimes, murder and treason not excepted. He swears to give a companion of this<br />

degree timely notice of any approaching danger that may be known to him. Now is a man bound fast by<br />

such an oath to be entrusted with office? Ought he to be accepted as a witness, a juror-when a Freemason<br />

is a party, in any case-a sheriff, constable, or marshal; ought he to be trusted with the office of a judge or<br />

justice of the peace? Gentlemen, you know he ought not, and you would despise me should I not be faithful<br />

in warning the public against entrusting such men with office‖. Finney was a third-degree Master Mason<br />

for eight years and joined the Meridihi peoplean Sun Lodge No. 32 in Warren, New York, around age 24<br />

in 1816. [8]<br />

However, he left Freemasonry later in life. ―I soon found that I was completely converted from<br />

Freemasonry to Christ, and that I could have no fellowship with any of the proceedings of the lodge. Its<br />

oaths appeared to me to be monstrously profane and barbarous‖. Finney came to believe that part of his<br />

oath as a Master Mason was immoral and that Masonry was dangerous to civil government, evidenced by<br />

the alleged murder of William Morgan [1774–1826?] who was a resident of Batavia, New York, whose<br />

disappearance ignited a powerful anti-Freemason movement in the United States in the early 19th century.<br />

After stating his intention to write a book exposing Freemasonry‘s secrets, Morgan was arrested,<br />

kidnapped, and then apparently killed. His disappearance sparked a public outcry and launched the<br />

formation of a new Anti-Masonic Party. [9]<br />

I also cover the Morgan case further on, and think we need to help reform a newer anti-Masonic Party<br />

now today in 2011, any volunteers?<br />

British Historian and former officer with the 11th Hussars, turned author Anthony Beevor, was told by<br />

a leading Freemason, that all thirteen [the Masonic number] members of the British Army Management<br />

Board in 1991 were Freemasons. Though the board comprised of a mix of politicians and top army<br />

officers, - that if their all wearing the ―same apron‖ as they stand gawping at the delights in the trough,<br />

then it goes without saying, that many a blind all-seeing-eye, will be turned. This board exercises<br />

authority over all forms of appointment‘s, ranking and promotion in the army, - and perhaps we now know<br />

why it‘s costing the taxpayer over £1 billion for the Royal Navy‘s newest and largest attack submarine<br />

HMS Astute which run aground off Skye on the 22nd of October 2010.<br />

Fair enough, so it was a Tory government in 1991, but this is just further evidence they‘re all the same,<br />

and isn‘t it ironic, that also in that same year Defence Secretary Tom King confirmed; Britain was to<br />

reduce the amount it spends on the army by more than a quarter over the next five years. After the<br />

spending cuts, the army contained 116,000 soldiers fewer than outlined in the 1990 strategy plan; Options<br />

for Change [where have I heard that saying before?], which sought to save between 10-15% of army costs.<br />

[10]<br />

See, things never-change, as it really doesn‘t matter who‘s in power, the Freemasons are in control at all<br />

times irrespective who wants to dress up and wear the PM‘s hat. On the 18th of October 2010 Defence<br />

Secretary and Freemason Liam Fox, said the UK will press ahead with building two aircraft carriers,<br />

despite the biggest government spending squeeze since World War II. The carriers will be built by a<br />

Masonic group whom BAE Systems Plc, Babcock International Group Plc and Thales SA are all part of,<br />

and at a cost of 4.9 billion pounds. ―It would have been more expensive to get out of the contract than to<br />

sustain it, but that is not to say there is not utility in it‖, Fox said. And this kind of; ―Gotcha by the<br />

bollocks contract‖, could only have been made possibly by colluding Freemasons who were making sure<br />

the government/tax payer could in no way renege on the agreement, as who else would have signed such a<br />

gun to your head kind of contract in the first place?<br />

Despite all I‘ve just said and touched on, I was basically unaware of all this before I began my research,<br />

so prior to that time I was still unconvinced the Freemasons were anything that special. It was obviously

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!