TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

- 88 -
poster onto the window, and the police officer just shrugged his shoulders, as if to agree I wasn‘t doing
much harm, and two, he didn‘t really care.
Of course there were protesters hell bent on causing as much trouble as possible, but because there
wasn‘t much objection or ‗policing‘ going on that day, they all took advantage of the situation. Though
little did many people realise and especially those local businesses that received the brunt of the damage
that day, - that they and other members of the public were used as political pawns in a battle raging
between the police and the government.
As I‘ve said, I was there, and again I believe agent provocateurs were employed to help whip-up a
frenzy, as oddly enough the main instigator attacking the HSBC bank in Cambridge Circus, was
supposedly meant to have been part of the ―Black Bloc‖ anarchists, whom all wear black from top to
bottom, including balaclavas and hoods etc. The objective of this kind of style of dress, is because it
makes it very difficult for the CCTV operators to keep track on who is who, when they ―all‖ look the
same.
Yet you check out the link [1a] , and watch the video, like I say, the main instigator not happy enough
with the bank‘s windows being daubed in paint and smashed to pieces, he then proceeds to enter the bank
via the broken doors. You‘ll notice he grabs hold of the handle so fingerprints would be there. But he has
to call on and encourage the others from the alleged ―Black Bloc‖ to join him, as many of them seemed
rather reluctant to do so. As here was a masked man wearing a ‗bright blue‘ t-shirt beckoning the others
all dressed in black to come and assist him to trash the inside of the bank. And it is him, who I believe
was/is one of the agent provocateurs employed that day, as he stood out like a sore thumb.
He intrigued me, so I watched him and followed him for five minutes or so after the event, though I
eventually lost him in the crowd. He‘s even been filmed by the worlds media doing it, so the CCTV
operators could have quite easily directed the police to; ―...the one with the bright blue t-shirt‖. Though
even if they did track him down and he was arrested, he would then later on reveal his true identity, and
would of course be released later on. I also understand that at times they change their clothing so as to not
be so easily recognised. Though it‘s normally done in the reverse order, i.e. ‗from black‘ to ‗civvy street‘
dress, not the other way around, - though who knows for sure as it‘s only an observation of mine.
As lo and behold the following Monday on the 28 th March 2011, Theresa May told the Commons that
149 of the more than 200 demonstrators arrested during violent clashes, and said: ―The message to those
who carry out violence is clear,‖ she said. ―You will be caught and you will be punished.‖
Ludicrously she said that; ―on the whole‖ the police operation was a success, adding: ―The police
might not have managed to prevent every act of violence but they were successful in preventing wider
criminality and are now actively engaged in investigating the perpetrators so that they can be brought to
justice.‖
―Just as the police review their operational tactics, so we in the Home Office will review the powers
available to the police,‖ she said. ―If the police need more help to do their work, I will not hesitate in
granting it to them.‖ May added; ―...parliament would always back the police when they do their
important work‖ [1b] . – The Police 6 the Government 0.
Following this protest and with what‘s still yet to come, then you‘re hardly going to reduce the numbers
of police and interfere with their overtime etc., when these so called ―hooligans‖ are just yards from those
members of parliaments own front doors, now are you Theresa, - no. In fact you going to introduce even
more stringent laws and regulations aren‘t you, - yes. And that‘s one of the reason violent protests don‘t
really work, as all you‘re doing is playing into hands of the money grabbing law makers, the government
and the police in general.
As most members of the public, not even the ‗violent‘ ones, - normally cause aggro, - but that‘s
certainly not what these bodies want see or hear, so ‗employ‘ agent provocateurs to carry out the work, of
course 99% of those in the government and the police etc. play no part in this role, and that‘s why secret
societies exist, as it‘s those members that do it all. I can recall the time when they couldn‘t even rely on
the likes of the notorious Combat 18 [C18] to cause regular fracas‘s, fights or disturbances, so imbedded
undercover police officers within that and other likewise secret groups and organisations, - so it was these
―members‖ who had the ‗bravado‘to start all the trouble at many football matches and arrange meetings to
have a good old row etc., - knowing full well that if and when they were ever caught, they‘d soon be
released due to; ‗insufficient evidence‘. So I‘m sorry to say it again, but the only ‗real criminals‘ are the
ones on the governments payroll, - yeah that‘s right you the tax payer are even paying for that!
The only true and successful way to protest, is by having well organised mass sit-ins and takeovers of
various prime areas and places, - and don‘t go until you get some figgy pudding. As what good did all